2020
DOI: 10.3390/w12061735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Rainfall Design Values for the City of Oslo, Norway—Comparison of Methods and Quantification of Uncertainty

Abstract: Due to its location, its old sewage system, and the channelling of rivers, Oslo is highly exposed to urban flooding. Thus, it is crucial to provide relevant and reliable information on extreme precipitation in the planning and design of infrastructure. Intensity-Duration-Frequency (IDF) curves are a frequently used tool for that purpose. However, the computational method for IDF curves in Norway was established over 45 years ago, and has not been further developed since. In our study, we show that the current … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Norway (NO): Until the late 1990s, observations were made by tipping-bucket gauges of type Plumatic, with a 0.2 mm volume resolution and a 1-min time step. From that time, these gauges were all successively replaced by the Lambrecht 1518 H3 tipping-bucket pluviometer with 0.1 mm and 1-min resolutions (Lutz et al 2020). Unheated tippingbucket gauges are not operative in the winter season.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Norway (NO): Until the late 1990s, observations were made by tipping-bucket gauges of type Plumatic, with a 0.2 mm volume resolution and a 1-min time step. From that time, these gauges were all successively replaced by the Lambrecht 1518 H3 tipping-bucket pluviometer with 0.1 mm and 1-min resolutions (Lutz et al 2020). Unheated tippingbucket gauges are not operative in the winter season.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The five cities cover three climatic classes, based on the Köppen Geiger classification system (Kottek et al 2006), as presented in Table 1. The precipitation data are collected and quality-checked (Lutz et al 2020) by the Norwegian Meteorological Institute (MET). Hence, no further data processing has been done to the precipitation data.…”
Section: Long-term Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factor was selected based on the values reported by Hanssen-Bauer et al [32] for the case study region (Agder) under high emissions scenario (RCP8.5). For details of the Bayesian MCMC method, we refer the reader to the studies by Reis Jr and Stedinger [33], Gaume et al [34], and Lutz et al [35].…”
Section: Hydrodynamic Simulations and Input Rangesmentioning
confidence: 99%