1989
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9453(1989)115:4(390)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Pit Excavation Volume Using Unequal Intervals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earthwork volume is calculated by comparing surface models of a project from measurements taken before and after construction. Various approaches for calculating borrow pit volumes are presented in the literature (Chambers, 1989;Chen & Lin, 1991;Easa, 1998;Yanalak, 2005). This capability is available in many commercial software packages; however, these sometimes just provide total quantities of cut and fill, making verification difficult.…”
Section: Finite Element Based Surface Generation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earthwork volume is calculated by comparing surface models of a project from measurements taken before and after construction. Various approaches for calculating borrow pit volumes are presented in the literature (Chambers, 1989;Chen & Lin, 1991;Easa, 1998;Yanalak, 2005). This capability is available in many commercial software packages; however, these sometimes just provide total quantities of cut and fill, making verification difficult.…”
Section: Finite Element Based Surface Generation Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reliable and accurate earthwork volume calculation was the target of many authors through the past 30 years. Different mathematical models were suggested by Easa (1988;Chambers, 1989;Chen and Lin, 1991;Davis, 1994;Easa, 1998;Yanalak, 2005;Yilmaz, 2010;Mukherji, 2012;Khalil, 2014) to estimate the volume of pit excavation. Earthwork calculation for roadway construction was also investigated by many researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, classical methods have been used in volume computing. The trapezoidal method (rectangular or triangular prisms), classical cross‐sectioning (trapezoidal, Simpson, and average formula), and improved methods (Simpson‐based, cubic spline, and cubic Hermite formula) have been presented in the literature 2–4 . How to achieve efficient volume computation with high accuracy is an important question both theoretically and practically 5…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trapezoidal method (rectangular or triangular prisms), classical cross-sectioning (trapezoidal, Simpson, and average formula), and improved methods (Simpson-based, cubic spline, and cubic Hermite formula) have been presented in the literature. [2][3][4] How to achieve efficient volume computation with high accuracy is an important question both theoretically and practically. 5 Usually, a minimum of two people are needed for classical measurement; however, one person is sufficient for photogrammetric processing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%