1990
DOI: 10.2307/1269842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Outgoing Quality Using the Quality Measurement Plan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we should select a geometric Poisson CUSUM scheme with K ¼ 3. One of the criteria that is worth consideration is the cost associated with Type I and Type II errors (Brush, Hoadley, and Saperstein, 1990). Thus, the chosen CUSUM scheme for the geometric Poisson process is This particular geometric Poisson CUSUM scheme means that the average number of observations needed to detect the process change is 15, if the process mean shifts from 2.5 to 4.…”
Section: The Geometric Poisson Cusum Control Scheme a Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we should select a geometric Poisson CUSUM scheme with K ¼ 3. One of the criteria that is worth consideration is the cost associated with Type I and Type II errors (Brush, Hoadley, and Saperstein, 1990). Thus, the chosen CUSUM scheme for the geometric Poisson process is This particular geometric Poisson CUSUM scheme means that the average number of observations needed to detect the process change is 15, if the process mean shifts from 2.5 to 4.…”
Section: The Geometric Poisson Cusum Control Scheme a Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was observed in practice at some organizations that accepting or rejecting lots is not always a yes or no decision. When the lot sizes are small and the sample is thus a significant amount of the lot, the “good” units in the sample might be accepted, while the “bad” units in the sample and the uninspected units are rejected (Brush et al , 1990). Another company specifies that their small wood dowels be received with less than 0.01 per cent defects due to the automated process used to assembly them into cabinets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual consumer's risk can be either too small or too high than expected. The outgoing quality has been an important parameter since the producers are required to demonstrate that their products are meeting specified quality standard as required by the consumers (Brush, Hoadley and Saperstein 1990). Therefore, it is required to have the sampling plan which represents the final quality level received by customer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%