2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1368-423x.2007.00206.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating option implied risk‐neutral densities using spline and hypergeometric functions

Abstract: Summary  We examine the ability of two recent methods – the smoothed implied volatility smile method (SML) and the density functionals based on confluent hypergeometric functions (DFCH) – for estimating implied risk‐neutral densities (RNDs) from European‐style options. Two complementary Monte Carlo experiments are conducted and the performance of the two RND estimators is evaluated by the root mean integrated squared error (RMISE) criterion. Results from both experiments show that the DFCH method outperforms t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the DFCH method, the results of Table 2 and the plots of Fig. 1 indicate that, despite the fact that this method provides more accurate estimates than the SPL one (see, also Bu and Hadri, 2007), it is outperformed by the MED-RNM method even when the latter is estimated based on a small data set, e.g. N 2 = 7.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the DFCH method, the results of Table 2 and the plots of Fig. 1 indicate that, despite the fact that this method provides more accurate estimates than the SPL one (see, also Bu and Hadri, 2007), it is outperformed by the MED-RNM method even when the latter is estimated based on a small data set, e.g. N 2 = 7.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…1997) and the A-type Gram-Charlier series expansion (see Corrado and Su, 1996). 8 Bu and Hadri (2007) indicate that it also outperforms the SPL method, too. In our simulation study, we assume that option prices are generated from the stochastic volatility with jumps (SVJ) model suggested by Bates (1996).…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a treatment is a matter of convenience. We therefore stick to (10) and (11) according to the range of γ for the rest of the paper. It is easily verified that ∂U (r t , γ) /∂r t = r −γ t .…”
Section: Transformation Functions and Sdesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conversion to deltas may be done using the same at-the-money volatility for all strikes (so-called "point conversion") or using each strike's volatility ("smile conversion") to avoid cases in which segments of the volatility smile are so steep that an option may have a lower call delta than another with a higher exercise price. Bu and Hadri (2007) discuss the phenomenon, which intuitively seems likely to be due to no-arbitrage violations in the data. The issue doesn't arise with our technique because we are going from input data sets in (δ, σ)-space to (δ, X)-space rather than vice versa.…”
Section: Time Series Of Tail Risk Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%