2023
DOI: 10.1111/itor.13260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating optimal objective values for the TSP, VRP, and other combinatorial problems using randomization

Abstract: Approximation of the optimal tour length in a Euclidean traveling salesman problem (TSP) has been studied by many researchers. In a previous study, we used the standard deviation in random tour lengths to approximate the optimal tour length in both Euclidean and non‐Euclidean TSPs and we obtained good estimates. In this paper, we show that the strong power‐law relationship between the standard deviation in random feasible solution values and the optimal solution value also holds for other Euclidean and near‐Eu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The VRP, first introduced by Dantzig and Ramser (1959), has been extended to abundant variants due to enormous different practical distribution scenarios (Kou et al., 2023). In recent years, exact algorithms for the VRP have received a good amount of research attention and are able to solve the instances with up to 200 customers, such as the branch‐and‐cut algorithms and branch‐and‐price algorithms (Baldacci et al., 2011; Pecin et al., 2017; Costa et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VRP, first introduced by Dantzig and Ramser (1959), has been extended to abundant variants due to enormous different practical distribution scenarios (Kou et al., 2023). In recent years, exact algorithms for the VRP have received a good amount of research attention and are able to solve the instances with up to 200 customers, such as the branch‐and‐cut algorithms and branch‐and‐price algorithms (Baldacci et al., 2011; Pecin et al., 2017; Costa et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%