2020
DOI: 10.1177/0022343320965670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating one-sided-killings from a robust measurement model of human rights

Abstract: Counting repressive events is difficult because state leaders have an incentive to conceal actions of their subordinates and destroy evidence of abuse. In this article, we extend existing latent variable modeling techniques in the study of repression to account for the uncertainty inherent in count data generated for this type of difficult-to-observe event. We demonstrate the utility of the model by focusing on a dataset that defines ‘one-sided-killing’ as government-caused deaths of non-combatants. In additio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These scores measure the physical integrity rights protection in each country-year by using a dynamic item response model that aggregates a bundle of hard-to-observe repressive indicators (e.g. torture, ill-treatment, imprisonment, violence) in a summary score (Fariss, 2014; Fariss, Kenwick & Reuning, 2020; Reuning, Kenwick & Fariss, 2019). Fariss et al create a single latent measure of repression for countries in a given year drawing on 16 different sources of human rights information, including the CIRI Human Rights Data Project (Cingranelli & Richards, 1999), the Ill-Treatment and Torture (ITT) Country-Year Data (Conrad, Haglund & Moore, 2013), the Political Terror Scale (Gibney et al, 2019), and the UCDP One-Sided Violence Dataset, 1989–2015 (e.g.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These scores measure the physical integrity rights protection in each country-year by using a dynamic item response model that aggregates a bundle of hard-to-observe repressive indicators (e.g. torture, ill-treatment, imprisonment, violence) in a summary score (Fariss, 2014; Fariss, Kenwick & Reuning, 2020; Reuning, Kenwick & Fariss, 2019). Fariss et al create a single latent measure of repression for countries in a given year drawing on 16 different sources of human rights information, including the CIRI Human Rights Data Project (Cingranelli & Richards, 1999), the Ill-Treatment and Torture (ITT) Country-Year Data (Conrad, Haglund & Moore, 2013), the Political Terror Scale (Gibney et al, 2019), and the UCDP One-Sided Violence Dataset, 1989–2015 (e.g.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We complement this dataset with geo-located information on violence against civilians reported in the Armed Conflict Location and Event Dataset (ACLED) (Raleigh et al, 2010) and the Latent Human Rights Protection Scores (e.g. Fariss, Kenwick & Reuning, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pan and Siegel, 2020; Sullivan, 2016); how insurgency influences counter-insurgency (e.g. Krcmaric, 2018; Valentino et al, 2004); how counter-insurgency influences insurgency (e.g. Lyall and Wilson, 2009; Toft and Zhukov, 2012); how protest influences protest policing (e.g.…”
Section: Polarization Exists Within the Topics We Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These researchers did not consider all forms of contention as they generally left out state activities, but they did bring together a large collection of behavior enacted by non-state actors. Following in this tradition, Fariss et al (2020) have brought together a variety of repressive indicators to explore/create a latent variable for this form of boundarization.…”
Section: Relative Contention As a Unifying Measurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…22.The most recent version of these data are based on an updated latent variable model presented in Fariss, Kenwick and Reuning (2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%