2014
DOI: 10.1080/15481603.2014.909107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating number of trees, tree height and crown width using Lidar data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The application of airborne LiDAR and high spatial resolution satellite data are limited due to their high cost as well as small coverage (e.g., swath width of Quickbird, Ikonos, Worldview 1, Worldview 2, and Worldview 3 are 16.8 km, 11.3 km, 17.6 km, 16.4 km, and 13.1 km, respectively), though they are promising in certain applications. For instance, LiDAR was reported to provide promising estimates of forest biomass [26][27][28], tree height [29][30][31], and detection of individual tree crowns [32][33][34]. In comparison, the other optical multispectral satellite data of lower spatial resolution had a relatively large coverage area (e.g., the swath width at the nadir of RapidyEye, SPOT-5, Landsat and MODIS is 77 km, 60 km, 185 km, and 2330 km, respectively), which reduced the cost per unit area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of airborne LiDAR and high spatial resolution satellite data are limited due to their high cost as well as small coverage (e.g., swath width of Quickbird, Ikonos, Worldview 1, Worldview 2, and Worldview 3 are 16.8 km, 11.3 km, 17.6 km, 16.4 km, and 13.1 km, respectively), though they are promising in certain applications. For instance, LiDAR was reported to provide promising estimates of forest biomass [26][27][28], tree height [29][30][31], and detection of individual tree crowns [32][33][34]. In comparison, the other optical multispectral satellite data of lower spatial resolution had a relatively large coverage area (e.g., the swath width at the nadir of RapidyEye, SPOT-5, Landsat and MODIS is 77 km, 60 km, 185 km, and 2330 km, respectively), which reduced the cost per unit area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other recent studies have also reported using high-resolution LiDAR for accurately and efficiently obtaining data on road position (White et al 2010, Craven & Wing 2014. Using this technology, forest managers can reduce the necessity for field-based investigations focused on this essential parameter, the obtained data being also useful for many other forest inven-3D display of the present forested area with the ancient underground defensive structures of the Roman Empire Frontiers from Moigrad-Porolissum tory operations (Popescu et al 2003, Unger et al 2014.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the transdisciplinary use of LiDAR data available from a particular area has rarely been accomplished (Harpold et al 2015). In addition to ancient structures mapping, LiDAR provides accurate measurements of numerous forest inventory attributes at a level of detail that is unavailable to traditional forestry measurements (Popescu & Wynne 2004, Wulder et al 2008, Unger et al 2014, facilitates forest road network mapping (White et al 2010, Azizi et al 2014, and the delineation of forest creeks and streams (Wulder et al 2008, Roman et al 2015. The detailed forest road network map provides essential information for forestry practices such as forest management, fire protection, transport of forest products and prevention of smuggling, but also for travel, recreation and education (White et al 2010, Abdi et al 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters of individual trees, such as tree location, tree species, tree height, diameter at breast height (DBH), and crown diameter, are vital for sustainable and precise forest management [4][5][6]. These individual tree-related properties can also be utilized to estimate forest parameters at stand level, such as tree species composition, mean tree height, timber volume, canopy density, and mean basal area [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%