Estimating Number of Shells in Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers: A New Approach Based on Temperature Cross

Abstract

Multipass heat exchangers are often designed by using the rule of thumb FT⩾0.75, which is rather arbitrary. FT falls sharply with the increase in temperature cross. Hence, only a limited temperature cross can be allowed. The ability to accommodate temperature cross increases rapidly as the number of shell passes is increased. Though many investigators have emphasized the importance of temperature cross in exchanger design, it has as yet not been explicitly accounted for in the design. This paper introduces a new approach for estimating the number shells in a shell and tube exchanger which directly accounts for temperature cross, rather than routing this effect through FT or XP (Ahmad et al.’s parameter, which is again a correction factor not directly related to temperature cross). The approach is compatible with the established design procedures and bypasses the FT. It generates better designs by defining maximum permissible temperature cross, than the traditional designs based on specifying minimum permissible FT. Expressions have also been provided which correlate the present formulation with that of Ahmad et al. [S0022-1481(00)00803-3]

Numerical investigation on combined single shell-pass shell-and-tube heat exchanger with two-layer continuous helical baffles

“…Among different types of heat exchangers, the shelland-tube heat exchangers (STHXs) have relatively simple manufacture and multi-purpose application possibilities for gaseous and liquid media in a large temperature and pressure range [1]. It was reported that more than 30% of the heat exchangers are of the shell-and-tube type [2,3].…”

Lean-and-Green Strength Performance Optimization of a Tube-to-Tubesheet Joint for a Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger Using Taguchi Methods and Random Forests

“…The heat flow is conducted through a solid separation, such that the two media are prevented from coming in direct contact and physically interacting [3]. It is well known that the shell-and-tube heat exchanger is a preferred equipment option in unit operations, by as much as 35-40% in industrial applications, due to some favorable aspects: (1) its production simplicity, (2) its production cost-effectiveness, (3) its convenient maintenance, and (4) its versatility in wide operating conditions [4][5][6][7].…”

Effect of Spacing Between Baffles on the Dynamic and Thermal Behavior of Water in a Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger

“…In recent years, shell and tube heat exchangers are widely used in many fields of engineering such as chemical engineering processes, power generation, petroleum refining, refrigeration, air conditioning, the food industry [1]. The shelland-tube heat exchangers are relatively simple to manufacture, and offer versatile application in comparison with other types of heat exchangers [2], it is reported that more than 30% of the heat exchangers used are of the type shell tube [3].…”