2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.socnet.2012.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating network properties from snowball sampled data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide test cases, we exploited an anonymized data set that was gathered from Facebook [13]. We selected 10 sizes ranging from 400 to 2500 people, and for each size value we randomly extracted 10 sub-graphs from the data set using the snowball sampling algorithm [14], which has been shown to preserve the topological structure of graphs. For each extracted sub-graph, we created a KB (in RDF) containing nodes of type Person and mse:knows relationships between them.…”
Section: B Experimental Results On Smart Phonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide test cases, we exploited an anonymized data set that was gathered from Facebook [13]. We selected 10 sizes ranging from 400 to 2500 people, and for each size value we randomly extracted 10 sub-graphs from the data set using the snowball sampling algorithm [14], which has been shown to preserve the topological structure of graphs. For each extracted sub-graph, we created a KB (in RDF) containing nodes of type Person and mse:knows relationships between them.…”
Section: B Experimental Results On Smart Phonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recruiting 40 seeds to start the snowball chains in two consecutive sub-samples with 20 seeds each helped to balance homophily bias. In addition the project team in Berlin developed a method to balance degree-bias (Illenberger and Flötteröd 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chains were started with 40 seeds. Surveying properties of a population-wide network by starting snowball chains with few initial respondents, which are referred to as 'ego-seeds', and continuing for a medium number of iterations was suggested by a simulation study at TU Berlin (Illenberger and Flötteröd 2012). Continuing with seeds" social contacts, the study collected information on nearly 800 respondents and their approximately 15,600 social contacts.…”
Section: Illenberger and Flötteröd 2012)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, if strong homophily exists between individuals, the researcher is confronted with a homogenous cluster. (Illenberger& Flötteröd, 2012). As this situation is given for the target group of students in the DACH region, the snowball principle was applied in the data collection procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Gruman and Saks, 2011) From the methodological point of view a different sampling may reveal different results. Various methods to account for snowball sampling bias have been proposed in the past (Frank & Snijders, 1994;Thompson & Frank, 2000;Heckathorn, 2002;Chow and Thompson, 2003;Volz & Heckathorn, 2008;Handcock & Gille, 2010) Since snowball sampling can be implemented in quite different variants, each specification usually requires its own inference approach (Illenberger & Flötteröd, 2012). Further research should therefore focus on the effects on variations in different sampling designs.…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%