2017
DOI: 10.1002/qj.3048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating model‐error covariances in nonlinear state‐space models using Kalman smoothing and the expectation–maximization algorithm

Abstract: Specification and tuning of errors from dynamical models are important issues in data assimilation. In this work, we propose an iterative expectation-maximisation (EM) algorithm to estimate the model error covariances using classical extended and ensemble versions of the Kalman smoother. We show that, for additive model errors, the estimate of the error covariance converges. We also investigate other forms of model error, such as parametric or multiplicative errors. We show that additive Gaussian model error i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EM algorithm was able to estimate subgrid-scale parameters with good accuracy while standard ensemble Kalman filter techniques failed. It has also been applied to the Lorenz-63 system to estimate model error covariance (Dreano et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EM algorithm was able to estimate subgrid-scale parameters with good accuracy while standard ensemble Kalman filter techniques failed. It has also been applied to the Lorenz-63 system to estimate model error covariance (Dreano et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Q ; Nakabayashi and Ueno, ; Pulido et al ) and/or diagonal (Ueno and Nakamura, ; Dreano et al ) covariance parametrizations, some success has been noted. However, the scope of this paper is restricted to the estimation of a single multiplicative inflation factor, β , for trueboldB¯.…”
Section: Overview: Adaptive Inflationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Gaussian additive noise might not even be the best statistical model for such error. The optimal value of q could be determined using an empirical Bayes approach based on, for instance, the expectation-maximisation technique in order to determine the maximum a posteriori of the conditional density of 5 q (see e.g., Dreano et al, 2017;Pulido et al, 2018). However, this would make us deviate too much from the objective of this work.…”
Section: Inferring the Dynamics From Partial And Noisy Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%