Estimating Marginal Returns to Medical Care: Evidence from At-Risk Newborns

Abstract

We estimate marginal returns to medical care for at-risk newborns by comparing health outcomes and medical treatment provision on either side of common risk classifications, most notably the "very low birth weight" threshold at 1500 grams. First, using data on the census of US births in available years from 1983-2002, we find evidence that newborns with birth weights just below 1500 grams have lower one-year mortality rates than do newborns with birth weights just above this cutoff, even though mortality risk tends to decrease with birth weight. One-year mortality falls by approximately one percentage point as birth weight crosses 1500 grams from above, which is large relative to mean one-year mortality of 5.5% just above 1500 grams. Second, using hospital discharge records for births in five states in available years from 1991-2006, we find evidence that newborns with birth weights just below 1500 grams have discontinuously higher costs and frequencies of specific medical inputs. We estimate a $4,000 increase in hospital costs as birth weight approaches 1500 grams from above, relative to mean hospital costs of $40,000 just above 1500 grams. Taken together, these estimates suggest that the cost of saving a statistical life of a newborn with birth weight near 1500 grams is on the order of $550,000 in 2006 dollars.

Can Health Care Information Technology Save Babies?

“…Our estimates are also marginally lower than the local cost estimates of saving a baby near the very low birthweight threshold of $550,000, reported in Almond et al (2010) …”

The Value of Medicaid: Interpreting Results from the Oregon Health Insurance Experiment

“…Estimating the health production function dh dm is notoriously challenging. Indeed, the literature has found it challenging enough to estimate a local average treatment effect for the impact of medical spending on health (see, e.g., Almond et al (2010) for one approach [1]). In our case, the challenges are compounded by the fact that we must estimate heterogeneity in these returns across the values of the endogenous choice of medical spending.…”

Saving Lives at Birth: The Impact of Home Births on Infant Outcomes

“…The first strand includes the economic studies of returns to medical technologies, the majority of which examine treatments for heart attack patients (e.g., McClellan and Newhouse 1997; Cutler et al 1998;McClellan and Noguchi 1998;Skinner, Staiger, and Fisher 2006). The handful of papers analyzing the returns to childbirth technologies focus almost exclusively on at-risk newborns, particularly those with low and very low birth weight (Cutler and Meara 2000;Almond et al 2010;Bharadwaj, Løken, and Neilson 2013;Freedman 2012). One notable exception is the study by Almond and Doyle (2011) on the health benefits of longer hospitalizations for newborns following uncomplicated births.…”