2006
DOI: 10.3133/sir20065035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating low-flow frequency statistics for unregulated streams in Idaho

Abstract: Multiply By To obtain cubic foot per second (ft 3 /s) 0.02832 cubic meter per second foot (ft) 0.3048 meter inch (in.) 2.54 centimeter inch per year (in/yr) 25.4 millimeter per year mile (mi) 1.609 kilometer square mile 2.590 square kilometer Datums Vertical coordinate information is referenced to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD 88). Horizontal coordinate information is referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83). Altitude, as used in this report, refers to distance above the vertic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting estimated streamflow at the ungaged location should be verified to be hydrologically reasonable with respect to the streamflows at the streamgage. A general "rule of thumb" in other regression analyses is to use the traditional drainagearea ratio (equation 1) to estimate streamflow when the ratio of the drainage area of the ungaged location to that of the streamgage is between 0.5 and 1.5 (Hortness, 2006). Although the drainage-area ratio attempts to ensure continuity in streamflow as the distance between gages decreases, Archfield and Vogel (2010) noted that this rule of thumb generally appears to result in poorer agreement between observed and estimated streamflows.…”
Section: Limitations Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting estimated streamflow at the ungaged location should be verified to be hydrologically reasonable with respect to the streamflows at the streamgage. A general "rule of thumb" in other regression analyses is to use the traditional drainagearea ratio (equation 1) to estimate streamflow when the ratio of the drainage area of the ungaged location to that of the streamgage is between 0.5 and 1.5 (Hortness, 2006). Although the drainage-area ratio attempts to ensure continuity in streamflow as the distance between gages decreases, Archfield and Vogel (2010) noted that this rule of thumb generally appears to result in poorer agreement between observed and estimated streamflows.…”
Section: Limitations Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard error values in logarithm (base 10) format represent the errors of equations developed by using the logarithm (base 10) transformed data. The range of percent error represents the errors for the final untransformed equations (Hortness, 2006). The standard error of prediction (SEP) also was computed for the ordinary-least-squares regression (table 4).…”
Section: Accuracy and Limitations Of Regression Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La rĂ©gionalisation Ă  base de relations empiriques simples entre dĂ©bits de rĂ©fĂ©rence d'Ă©tiage et caractĂ©ristiques physiques et climatiques des bassins versants demeure une approche privilĂ©giĂ©e par la communautĂ© scientifique (HORTNESS, 2006;LACEY et GRAYSON, 1997;RIES et FRIESZ, 2000;TALLAKSEN et VAN LANEN, 2004). Le choix des variables explicatives se fonde sur les processus hydrologiques dominants, sur la facilitĂ© de calcul des variables et leur disponibilitĂ© dans les bases de donnĂ©es.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…None of the QAH values were zero, so logistic-regression equations were not developed for QAH. Procedures and assumptions of logistic regression are described in detail elsewhere (Tasker, 1989;Ludwig and Tasker, 1993;SAS Institute, Inc., 1995;Allison, 1999;Hosmer and Lemeshow, 2000;Helsel and Hirsch, 2002;Hortness, 2006;Bent andSteeves, 2006, Eash andBarnes, 2012). Explanatory variables tested in the logistic regressions included numerous physical and climatic characteristics of each gaged basin (table 2).…”
Section: Logistic-regression Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%