2009
DOI: 10.3758/brm.41.3.909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating long-range dependence in time series: An evaluation of estimators implemented in R

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed DFA using the package 'fractal' (Constantine & Percival 2011) in R statistical software 2.11.1 (R Development Core Team 2008). In order to avoid spurious results that can arise when relying on any single fractal analytical method (Gao et al 2006, Stroe-Kunold et al 2009), we supplement our analysis by also estimating the scaling exponents of these sequences using 2 other fractal methods: power spectral density (PSD), which is one of the more commonly used methods to identify the presence of scaling behaviour (Eke et al 2000), and the madogram, which provides a robust estimate of fractal dimension (Bez & Bertrand 2011). Like αDFA, β PSD also provides information about the nature of the signal under investigation, with β ε (−1, 1) and β ε (1, 3) indicating fGn and fBm, respectively (Cannon et al 1997).…”
Section: Diving Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed DFA using the package 'fractal' (Constantine & Percival 2011) in R statistical software 2.11.1 (R Development Core Team 2008). In order to avoid spurious results that can arise when relying on any single fractal analytical method (Gao et al 2006, Stroe-Kunold et al 2009), we supplement our analysis by also estimating the scaling exponents of these sequences using 2 other fractal methods: power spectral density (PSD), which is one of the more commonly used methods to identify the presence of scaling behaviour (Eke et al 2000), and the madogram, which provides a robust estimate of fractal dimension (Bez & Bertrand 2011). Like αDFA, β PSD also provides information about the nature of the signal under investigation, with β ε (−1, 1) and β ε (1, 3) indicating fGn and fBm, respectively (Cannon et al 1997).…”
Section: Diving Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, middle). The existence of such a situation is well-known in literature and usually it is referred to the fact that in analyzed time series we have longterm dependences [9]. This is especially visible if plot is done on a log-log scale (Fig.…”
Section: Results Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each parameter, numerous estimators have been developed, but there is no clear winner among them (Stroe-Kunold et al, 2009; Stadnytska et al, 2010; Stadnitski, 2012). Furthermore, statistical characteristics of some non-fractal empirical structures can resemble those of 1/ f noise, which may cause erroneous classifications (Wagenmakers et al, 2004; Thornton and Gilden, 2005).…”
Section: Measuring Fractalitymentioning
confidence: 99%