2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2023.104813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating locations of soil–rock interfaces based on vibration data during shield tunnelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shen et al [79] also used sensors arranged at the back of the bulkhead inside the shield machine to monitor the vibration signals. The monitoring system included one triaxial accelerometer and three unilateral accelerometers, the type specification of the sensor was MPS-ACC03X/01X-IEPE, and the fixing method was magnetic suction, as shown in Figure 7d.…”
Section: Indirect Monitoring Within the Shieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shen et al [79] also used sensors arranged at the back of the bulkhead inside the shield machine to monitor the vibration signals. The monitoring system included one triaxial accelerometer and three unilateral accelerometers, the type specification of the sensor was MPS-ACC03X/01X-IEPE, and the fixing method was magnetic suction, as shown in Figure 7d.…”
Section: Indirect Monitoring Within the Shieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work can help engineers better understand the vibration generation mechanism in complex formations, and provide reference for geological identification based on vibration analysis. Shen et al [79] analyzed the time-frequency spectral characteristics of vibration signals in various formations using continuous wavelet transform (CWT) for identifying the vibration peaks and their periods. Based on the process of disc cutter collision with the soil-rock interface (SRI), the key factors affecting the amplitude of the acceleration peak (installation radius of the disc cutter and the position of the SRI) were identified.…”
Section: Predicting Geologic Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their capacity to comprehensively encapsulate intricate and non-linear circumstances might sometimes be insufficiently robust, particularly when confronted with outliers or instances of extraordinary data. On the other hand, numerous researchers 4 , 19 27 have used artificial intelligence models to predict TBM performance, penetration rate, torque and thrust, cutter wearing, and lithology identification using geological information and TBM operational parameters. Despite integrating TBM parameters and lithology data into prior intelligent models, most research has focused on traditional methods for predicting how the conditions of the ground affect the operation of TBMs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%