2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating linear cortical magnification in human primary visual cortex via dynamic programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
69
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In MT/V5, eccentricities between 1 and 4°are represented along 12 mm cortex, corresponding to a magnification factor of 4 mm per visual degree. In V1, the magnification for those eccentricities would be approximately double according to Larsson and Heeger (2006) and Qiu et al (2006). This fits with the ratio of the surface areas of MT/V5 and V1 (Table 2), as ͌5 equals 2.2.…”
Section: General Features Of the Mt/v5 Clustersupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In MT/V5, eccentricities between 1 and 4°are represented along 12 mm cortex, corresponding to a magnification factor of 4 mm per visual degree. In V1, the magnification for those eccentricities would be approximately double according to Larsson and Heeger (2006) and Qiu et al (2006). This fits with the ratio of the surface areas of MT/V5 and V1 (Table 2), as ͌5 equals 2.2.…”
Section: General Features Of the Mt/v5 Clustersupporting
confidence: 73%
“…For the ROI localizer session, the stimulus was a flickering (10 Hz) radial checkerboard annulus, presented around fixation and scaled following the linear cortical magnification factor (Qiu et al, 2006). The annulus always had an inner radius of 1°, while the outer radius changed between 3.3°(corresponding to the full width of the Gabor stimuli in the experiment at half maximum contrast) and 5.5°.…”
Section: Roi Localizersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, for each hemisphere of each subject, cortical surfaces were read into a custom (Qiu et al, 2006) MatLab implementation of the Dijkstra algorithm for computing distances on a convoluted surface (Dijkstra, 1959). We defined pairs of vertices such that each pair contained a vertex along the dorsal boundary of V1 and a corresponding point along the ventral boundary.…”
Section: Retinotopic Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%