2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-010-0168-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Intensities and/or Strong Motion Parameters Using Civilian Monitoring Videos: The May 12, 2008, Wenchuan Earthquake

Abstract: One of the important issues in macroseismology and engineering seismology is how to get as much intensity and/or strong motion data as possible. We collected and studied several cases in the May 12, 2008, Wenchuan earthquake, exploring the possibility of estimating intensities and/or strong ground motion parameters using civilian monitoring videos which were deployed originally for security purposes. We used 53 video recordings in different places to determine the intensity distribution of the earthquake, whic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the relationships between peak ground accelerations and Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) proposed by Wald et al (1999), we obtained the distribution of intensity (MMI) from Fig. 17 Lekkas, 2010;Yang et al, 2011), meaning that one could have a variety of choices for the selection of a benchmark. However, in general, the purpose of modelling is not to be in total agreement with all existing results, but basically to match the main features.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the relationships between peak ground accelerations and Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) proposed by Wald et al (1999), we obtained the distribution of intensity (MMI) from Fig. 17 Lekkas, 2010;Yang et al, 2011), meaning that one could have a variety of choices for the selection of a benchmark. However, in general, the purpose of modelling is not to be in total agreement with all existing results, but basically to match the main features.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%