2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10310-004-0125-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating individual tree heights of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantations in mountainous areas using small-footprint airborne LiDAR

Abstract: Recently, it was shown that individual tree heights could be accurately estimated using small-footprint airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) remote sensing. Because most of the areas studied previously were limited to flat terrain, we investigated the accuracy of LiDAR-derived individual tree height estimates for different types of topographical features in mountainous forests with a steeper and more complex topography. Several middle-aged (40-50 years old) sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
48
1
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
48
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Plot slope, in general, has been found to be important previously too: For individual tree heights, it has been reported that underestimates of tree height were larger on lower elevations (−0.85 m) than on higher elevations (0.17 m) [38]. The importance of slope for the accuracy of Lidar-derived tree detection has also been studied [39]. It was reported that the accuracy of tree detection is 74% for steep slopes but is 86% for gentle slopes.…”
Section: Variable Importance From the Random Forest Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plot slope, in general, has been found to be important previously too: For individual tree heights, it has been reported that underestimates of tree height were larger on lower elevations (−0.85 m) than on higher elevations (0.17 m) [38]. The importance of slope for the accuracy of Lidar-derived tree detection has also been studied [39]. It was reported that the accuracy of tree detection is 74% for steep slopes but is 86% for gentle slopes.…”
Section: Variable Importance From the Random Forest Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A LiDAR point density of 10 points∕m 2 or more would significantly improve the ability to accurately map PPC and vegetation ground cover and detect detailed slope variation of stream banks at higher spatial resolution and enable a reduction of the plot section length. 32,67,68 For assessment of the mapping results and for comparison of different stream sections, it is recommended that sections covering at least one meander wavelength be used, as the outside of meander bends are often exposed to erosive processes and hence appear with low bank condition scores, whereas point bars are generally more stable. 40 Using at least one meander wavelength for assessment of bank condition mapping results will ensure a less biased comparison of different stream sections.…”
Section: Spatial Scaling Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly Naesset and Økland (2002) found an average point spacing of 1 m was insufficient to accurately estimate individual crown attributes (height to green canopy and crown length) in a Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forest, whilst Takahashi et al (2005) required data as dense as 8.8 LiDAR returns per m 2 to successfully estimate tree heights to within 1 m of field estimates in sugi (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don) plantation forests.…”
Section: Individual Tree-based Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%