Mapping the Travel Behavior Genome 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-817340-4.00028-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating impact of autonomous driving on value of travel time savings for long-distance trips using revealed and stated preference methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of autonomous driving, it is reasonable to assume a potential reduction in VTTS because of improved travel quality and time use. Empirical studies on VTTS in the context of autonomous driving have indeed found a reduction of VTTS for autonomous driving, however, they differ between autonomous vehicle (AV) concepts (e.g., privately owned vehicle compared with car sharing [e.g., 10]), trip types (lower for commuting and long distance trips, but not for short trips [10][11][12]), and vehicle design offering different opportunities for time use (VTTS for an AV with an office interior was found to be lower than VTTS for an AV with in a leisure one [13]). Moreover, significant heterogeneity in VoT among potential users can be shown (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of autonomous driving, it is reasonable to assume a potential reduction in VTTS because of improved travel quality and time use. Empirical studies on VTTS in the context of autonomous driving have indeed found a reduction of VTTS for autonomous driving, however, they differ between autonomous vehicle (AV) concepts (e.g., privately owned vehicle compared with car sharing [e.g., 10]), trip types (lower for commuting and long distance trips, but not for short trips [10][11][12]), and vehicle design offering different opportunities for time use (VTTS for an AV with an office interior was found to be lower than VTTS for an AV with in a leisure one [13]). Moreover, significant heterogeneity in VoT among potential users can be shown (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%