2014
DOI: 10.1145/2601097.2601159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating image depth using shape collections

Abstract: Figure 1: We attribute a single 2D image of an object (left) with depth by transporting information from a 3D shape deformation subspace learned by analyzing a network of related but different shapes (middle). For visualization, we color code the estimated depth with values increasing from red to blue (right). AbstractImages, while easy to acquire, view, publish, and share, they lack critical depth information. This poses a serious bottleneck for many image manipulation, editing, and retrieval tasks. In this p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the camera poses produced by our approach, which is based on joint estimation over an image collection, to camera poses produced by the approach of Su et al [2014], which estimates a camera pose for each image separately. Accuracy was measured by angular deviations from ground truth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We compared the camera poses produced by our approach, which is based on joint estimation over an image collection, to camera poses produced by the approach of Su et al [2014], which estimates a camera pose for each image separately. Accuracy was measured by angular deviations from ground truth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accuracy of pixel-level correspondences is measured by pixel distance from ground truth. We compare the accuracy of the presented approach to the accuracy of correspondences estimated by the approach of Su et al [2014]. Cumulative error distributions are shown in Figure 7.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations