2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2017.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating horizontal scale of fluctuation with limited CPT soundings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there are numerous publications demonstrate that the horizontal autocorrelation has a great influence on geotechnical site exploration and slope reliability analysis. [57][58][59][60] As observed from Figure 3, the horizontal scale of fluctuation is not infinity as has been assumed by using a one-dimensional (1D) random field in Section 3. To explore the effects of the random field mesh size, probability distribution and horizontal autocorrelation of soil parameters on the RBD results of slopes, the sandy slope example in Section 3 is further investigated here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, there are numerous publications demonstrate that the horizontal autocorrelation has a great influence on geotechnical site exploration and slope reliability analysis. [57][58][59][60] As observed from Figure 3, the horizontal scale of fluctuation is not infinity as has been assumed by using a one-dimensional (1D) random field in Section 3. To explore the effects of the random field mesh size, probability distribution and horizontal autocorrelation of soil parameters on the RBD results of slopes, the sandy slope example in Section 3 is further investigated here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Only the vertical autocorrelation of soil properties is taken into account in the RBD of slopes. However, there are numerous publications demonstrate that the horizontal autocorrelation has a great influence on geotechnical site exploration and slope reliability analysis 57–60 . As observed from Figure 3, the horizontal scale of fluctuation is not infinity as has been assumed by using a one‐dimensional (1D) random field in Section 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It is much more difficult to credibly estimate the values of SOF. Identification of these parameters, which can be understood as the average dimensions of a cluster within which the field values are strongly correlated, is a problem widely described in the literature (Lloret-Cabot et al, 2006;Cami et al, 2020;Bagińska et al, 2018;Ching et al, 2018). It is generally known that the value of SOF in the horizontal direction is larger than the value of SOF in the vertical direction.…”
Section: Basic Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct reason for this interest is the popularity of cone penetrometer test soundings (CPT), and consequently, obtaining enough data to estimate the vertical scale of fluctuation (that characterized the considered soil strength spatial variability). On the other hand, the recent development and increase of experience in the field of estimating fluctuation scales techniques accelerate the development towards the use of random field theory to assess bearing capacity (Ching et al, 2018). However, most of the existed studies on this subject use twodimensional simplification of the problem by assuming plane strain conditions (e.g., Fenton and Griffiths 2008;Pieczyńska-Kozłowska et.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%