2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating historical PM2.5 exposures for three decades (1987–2016) in Japan using measurements of associated air pollutants and land use regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seasonal spatial distribution of estimated PM 2.5 is presented in Figure S9. The PM 2.5 concentrations showed a decreased trend from 2011 to 2016 (Figure 7), which is consistent with the estimation in a previous study [46]. land use data to estimate monthly or annual mean PM2.5 concentrations.…”
Section: Pm 25 Estimatessupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The seasonal spatial distribution of estimated PM 2.5 is presented in Figure S9. The PM 2.5 concentrations showed a decreased trend from 2011 to 2016 (Figure 7), which is consistent with the estimation in a previous study [46]. land use data to estimate monthly or annual mean PM2.5 concentrations.…”
Section: Pm 25 Estimatessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…China implemented an Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan in 2013 with a series of stringent clean air actions during 2013-2017, which led to PM 2.5 rapidly decreasing across China [48]. In addition, the domestic emissions, especially those derived from road transport, decreased in Japan [46]. Hence, the decrease in both foreign and domestic emission sources may cause a long-term decreasing trend in Japan.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, studies based on statistical models that used long-term ground visibility observations as input to back extrapolate PM 2.5 concentrations , were limited by the spatial coverage and uncertainty of the visibility data. Specifically, visibility data are limited by their relative inaccuracy in high values and inconsistency as they shifted from human observers to automated sensors. , Third, the time span of the training data set in some previous statistical exposure studies was less than 3 years, , which could hardly capture the interannual difference in air pollution levels. Lastly, many studies estimated PM 2.5 concentrations at coarse spatiotemporal resolutions (e.g., 0.25° × 0.25°) and annual mean, which could not produce spatiotemporal-resolved exposure metrics based on different exposure durations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the most extensive monitoring systems were mainly developed in the United States and Western Europe, where regular monitoring of ambient air quality has been implemented since the mid-1970s [4]. Today, in Asia (especially Japan and China with a strong increase since the 2000s) there are extensive monitoring networks [5,6]. At the European level, the reference regulation for the monitoring and evaluation of air quality is set by Directive 2008/50/EC and subsequent amendments and additions [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%