2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating historical hourly traffic volumes via machine learning and vehicle probe data: A Maryland case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many of these studies evaluated probe performance using travel time reliability measures, such as the 90th or 95th percentile of travel time, standard deviation, percentage of variation, buffer time index (BTI), planning time index (PTI), travel time index (TTI), frequency of congestion, failure rate (with respect to average), on-time arrival, misery index, congestion detection latency, count of congestion, congestion duration, reliability curve, hourly traffic volume, congested hours, etc. (Aliari and Haghani 2012;Araghi et al 2015;Belzowski et al 2014;Cookson and Pishue 2016;Day et al 2015;FHWA 2017;Gong and Fan 2017;Lomax et al 2003a, b;Mcleod et al 2012;MoDOT 2017;Peniati 2004;Pu 2012;Remias et al 2013;Schrank et al 2012Schrank et al , 2015Sekuła et al 2017;Turner 2013;Venkatanarayana 2017;WSDOT, 2013WSDOT, , 2014Zheng et al 2018). An overview of these studies and the performance measures used to evaluate the reliability of probe data is provided in Table 1.…”
Section: Wide Area Probe Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these studies evaluated probe performance using travel time reliability measures, such as the 90th or 95th percentile of travel time, standard deviation, percentage of variation, buffer time index (BTI), planning time index (PTI), travel time index (TTI), frequency of congestion, failure rate (with respect to average), on-time arrival, misery index, congestion detection latency, count of congestion, congestion duration, reliability curve, hourly traffic volume, congested hours, etc. (Aliari and Haghani 2012;Araghi et al 2015;Belzowski et al 2014;Cookson and Pishue 2016;Day et al 2015;FHWA 2017;Gong and Fan 2017;Lomax et al 2003a, b;Mcleod et al 2012;MoDOT 2017;Peniati 2004;Pu 2012;Remias et al 2013;Schrank et al 2012Schrank et al , 2015Sekuła et al 2017;Turner 2013;Venkatanarayana 2017;WSDOT, 2013WSDOT, , 2014Zheng et al 2018). An overview of these studies and the performance measures used to evaluate the reliability of probe data is provided in Table 1.…”
Section: Wide Area Probe Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task 2-3 involved exploration of the base data set for freight applications. UMD completed this task, and the information gained was summarized in a published journal article (Sekula et al, 2018). NREL participated by reviewing UMD's work and attending a webinar on this topic.…”
Section: Task 2-3 Freight (Origin and Destination) Data And Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning has proven its ability to provide accurate estimates for different traffic characteristics [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Traffic speed and density have been estimated using an artificial neural network (ANN) model [23].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results indicated higher accuracy from the support vector machine algorithm than the k-nearest neighbor classification algorithm. Estimating hourly traffic volumes between sensors was addressed using an NN model in the Maryland highway network [27], deploying both probe vehicles and automatic traffic recording station data to construct the NN model. A comparison was also made between linear regression, k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine with linear kernel, random forest, and NN models, concluding that the NN model performed the best.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%