2021
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(21)01903-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Health Care Expenditure on Heart Failure in the United States: The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey 2008-2017

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) together constitute the majority of HF in the contemporary era and are associated with substantial death, disability, and healthcare costs. [1][2][3] Identification of therapeutic pathways to ameliorate symptom burden and functional impairment remains a central priority in the clinical care of this at-risk population, for whom evidence-based therapeutic options have been historically lacking. 4 Although with important limitations, [5][6][7][8] the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification is independently predictive of mortality irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), [9][10][11] is recommended in current international HF clinical practice guidelines to guide treatment eligibility, 12,13 and therein remains an important clinical metric widely used in clinical practice to characterize symptom burden and functional capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) together constitute the majority of HF in the contemporary era and are associated with substantial death, disability, and healthcare costs. [1][2][3] Identification of therapeutic pathways to ameliorate symptom burden and functional impairment remains a central priority in the clinical care of this at-risk population, for whom evidence-based therapeutic options have been historically lacking. 4 Although with important limitations, [5][6][7][8] the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification is independently predictive of mortality irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), [9][10][11] is recommended in current international HF clinical practice guidelines to guide treatment eligibility, 12,13 and therein remains an important clinical metric widely used in clinical practice to characterize symptom burden and functional capacity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) together constitute the majority of HF in the contemporary era and are associated with substantial death, disability, and healthcare costs. 1 , 2 , 3 Identification of therapeutic pathways to ameliorate symptom burden and functional impairment remains a central priority in the clinical care of this at‐risk population, for whom evidence‐based therapeutic options have been historically lacking. 4…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%