2006
DOI: 10.1159/000093476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Haplotype Effects on Dichotomous Outcome for Unphased Genotype Data Using a Weighted Penalized Log-Likelihood Approach

Abstract: Objective: To develop a method to estimate haplotype effects on dichotomous outcomes when phase is unknown, that can also estimate reliable effects of rare haplotypes. Methods: In short, the method uses a logistic regression approach, with weights attached to all possible haplotype combinations of an individual. An EM-algorithm was used: in the E-step the weights are estimated, and the M-step consists of maximizing the joint log-likelihood. When rare haplotypes were present, a penalty function was introduced. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the obtained unphased SNP genotype data, haplotype frequencies and their effects on risk of ISR, repeat PCI, TLR, or MACE were estimated with weighted Cox regression as described. 19 Variables depicted by Cox proportional-hazard analysis to be predictive for ISR, repeat PCI, TLR, or MACE (PϽ0.05) and known predictive variables were entered into the model (control of confounding). We adjusted for multiple testing with the Bonferroni correction.…”
Section: Genotyping and Statistical Analysis Of The Genetic Associatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the obtained unphased SNP genotype data, haplotype frequencies and their effects on risk of ISR, repeat PCI, TLR, or MACE were estimated with weighted Cox regression as described. 19 Variables depicted by Cox proportional-hazard analysis to be predictive for ISR, repeat PCI, TLR, or MACE (PϽ0.05) and known predictive variables were entered into the model (control of confounding). We adjusted for multiple testing with the Bonferroni correction.…”
Section: Genotyping and Statistical Analysis Of The Genetic Associatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that rare SNPs are already penalized through the group penalty. The concept is similar to that used by Souverein et al [9], who used a ridge penalty scaled by the haplotype frequency.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 For the GEISHA study, from the obtained unphased SNP genotype data, haplotype frequencies and their effect on risk of TLR were estimated using weighted Cox regression as described. 18 On the basis of inferred haplotypes, we grouped patients as those having 1 or no copies of the risk haplotype (TCG) and as those having 2 copies of the risk haplotype. Differences were considered statistically significant at P<0.05, as determined by paired 2-sided Student t test (experiments with 2 groups) or 1-way or 2-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni or Dunnett test (experiments with >2 groups).…”
Section: Genotyping Of Snpsmentioning
confidence: 99%