2005
DOI: 10.1021/es049352m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Ground-Level PM2.5 in the Eastern United States Using Satellite Remote Sensing

Abstract: An empirical model based on the regression between daily PM 2.5 (particles with aerodynamic diameters of less than 2.5 µm) concentrations and aerosol optical thickness (AOT) measurements from the multiangle imaging spectroradiometer (MISR) was developed and tested using data from the eastern United States during the period of 2001. Overall, the empirical model explained 48% of the variability in PM 2.5 concentrations. The root-meansquare error of the model was 6.2 µg/m 3 with a corresponding average PM 2.5 con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

12
298
3
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 427 publications
(316 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
12
298
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have shown that the relationship between PM 2.5 and AOD is a multi-variate function of a large number of parameters (Liu et al, 2005;Lyamani et al, 2006;Choi et al, 2008;Natunen et al, 2010;Liu and Harrison, 2011). Further, many of these relationships are non-linear, some are of unknown functional form and many have non-Gaussian distributions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many studies have shown that the relationship between PM 2.5 and AOD is a multi-variate function of a large number of parameters (Liu et al, 2005;Lyamani et al, 2006;Choi et al, 2008;Natunen et al, 2010;Liu and Harrison, 2011). Further, many of these relationships are non-linear, some are of unknown functional form and many have non-Gaussian distributions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that the relationship between PM 2.5 and AOD is not always suitable for simple regression models. Rather it is determined by a multi-variate function of a large number of parameters, including: humidity, temperature, boundary layer height, surface pressure, population density, topography, wind speed, surface type, surface reflectivity, season, land use, normalised variance of rainfall events, size spectrum and phase of cloud particles, cloud cover, cloud optical depth, cloud top pressure and the proximity to particulate sources releasing PM 2.5 (Liu et al, 2005;Lyamani et al, 2006;Choi et al, 2008;Paciorek et al, 2012;). The picture is further complicated by the biases present in satellite AOD products (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…AOT data can be used to reveal the spatial heterogeneity characteristics of PM 2.5 concentration with the help of linear regression models (Wang and Christopher, 2003), but this data can reflect neither different temporal scales (seasonal, monthly and daily changes) of PM 2.5 distribution (Hoff et al 2009) nor spatial distribution of near-ground PM 2.5 ). All these studies were carried out with PM 2.5 observations of less than 100 mg/m 3 , because higher PM 2.5 concentrations will lead to biased and inaccurate predictions (Liu et al 2005), which happens in Beijing. Besides, missing values frequently occur in AOT data, especially when it is cloudy or hazy (Gupta et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) aerosol index at the ultraviolet wavelength is sensitive to absorbing aerosols so that it can be used to detect the cabonaceous and dust particles Torres et al, 1998). The relationship between column Aerosol Optical Depth(AOD) and surface PM2.5 has been explored over 4 United States using satellite AOD data (Wang and Christopher, 2003;Liu et al, 2005). They find that MODIS or MISR AOD has good correlations with hourly or monthly PM2.5 measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%