1986
DOI: 10.1016/0013-7944(86)90253-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating fracture toughness from small specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cylindrical samples with annular cracks exhibit numerous advantages when compared with the standard specimens recommended by the ASTM E399 Standard Test Method for Linear‐Elastic Plane‐Strain Fracture Toughness K Ic of Metallic Materials : (1) they are easy to machine and thus cheaper; (2) they need less amount of material to guarantee the plane strain condition because their circular geometry increases the constraint, thereby assuring a plane strain state with independence of their size; and (3) the annular crack does not end in a plane stress region. These specimens also exhibit some disadvantages, such as the frequent appearance of fatigue non‐symmetric crack advance, thus producing eccentricity of the circular ligament in relation to the bar axis. This phenomenon may be caused by slight non‐symmetries regarding the sample, the grips or the testing machine, as well as non‐uniform material properties, residual stress effects, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cylindrical samples with annular cracks exhibit numerous advantages when compared with the standard specimens recommended by the ASTM E399 Standard Test Method for Linear‐Elastic Plane‐Strain Fracture Toughness K Ic of Metallic Materials : (1) they are easy to machine and thus cheaper; (2) they need less amount of material to guarantee the plane strain condition because their circular geometry increases the constraint, thereby assuring a plane strain state with independence of their size; and (3) the annular crack does not end in a plane stress region. These specimens also exhibit some disadvantages, such as the frequent appearance of fatigue non‐symmetric crack advance, thus producing eccentricity of the circular ligament in relation to the bar axis. This phenomenon may be caused by slight non‐symmetries regarding the sample, the grips or the testing machine, as well as non‐uniform material properties, residual stress effects, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A precrack of about 300 #m depth was thus made at the bottom of the notch using a tempered 30 #m-thick razor blade. This rapid and easy method allows good control of the precrack eccentricity (< 100 #m, as required according to Stark and Ibrahim [1]) and induces a minimum strain-hardening at the tip of the precrack. Very deep precracks can be obtained in this way.…”
Section: Precracking Of the Rodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This geometry also presents several advantages well reassessed recently in the literature [1,2,3,4,5] and attracting the attention of many researchers especially for the characterization of fracture toughness when only small size specimens are available [3]. Indeed the triaxial stress state at the tip of a circumferential crack in a bar is close to plane strain even for a small rod diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The idea of CCB as alternative fracture mechanics samples is not new. Notched cracked bar have been used by Stark and Ibrahim [1], Ibrahim and Stark [2][3], and Lam and Ibrahim [4]. Devaux et al [5] used axisymmetric cracked bar to determine local approach fracture parameters to compare with CT data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%