1965
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci1965.0011183x000500040002x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Forage Yield in situ1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1966
1966
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The beta attenuation technique was introduced by workers at Purdue University , Teare and Mott 1965, Teare et al 1965) for crops and pastures. Basically, the method involves emitting p-particles on one side of a plot and then counting the particles which emerge on the other side of the plot.…”
Section: Beta Attenuation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beta attenuation technique was introduced by workers at Purdue University , Teare and Mott 1965, Teare et al 1965) for crops and pastures. Basically, the method involves emitting p-particles on one side of a plot and then counting the particles which emerge on the other side of the plot.…”
Section: Beta Attenuation Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For different pasture types, individual prediction equations were suggested (Campbell et al, 1962). Mott et al (1965) adapted the beta ray attenuation technique to estimate forage yield in situ , and found that the instrument readings were unaffected by either crop or moisture variables in determining beta attenuation coefficients. Barta and Teare (1968) observed that only one standard yield calibration curve was needed to estimate green forage yields at any moisture percentage.…”
Section: Determination Of Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neal and Neal (1973) presented a review of the advantages and 1 imitations of several types of forage meters for the nondestructive estimation of forage yield. The idea of estimating bulk density (Alexander et al, 1962) and its expression as a function of density and height (Teare and Mott, 1965) prompted the development of the calibrated disc of Phillips and Clarke (1971)…”
Section: Determination Of Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%