2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2011.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating fishery-scale rates of discard mortality using conditional reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
110
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
110
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The uncertainty surrounding this DM rate was estimated via a combined empirical and parametric bootstrap routine that accounted for error in each component, as well as the clustered nature of both the injury score observations and the tackle survey data (e.g. Benoît et al, 2012). Each of the 1000 routine iterations proceeded in two phases.…”
Section: Estimating a Fishery-wide Cod Dm Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uncertainty surrounding this DM rate was estimated via a combined empirical and parametric bootstrap routine that accounted for error in each component, as well as the clustered nature of both the injury score observations and the tackle survey data (e.g. Benoît et al, 2012). Each of the 1000 routine iterations proceeded in two phases.…”
Section: Estimating a Fishery-wide Cod Dm Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that assessing condition upon capture is valuable because it can be a reliable predictor of post-release mortality (Hueter et al, 2006;Benoît et al, 2012). In the absence of tagging studies, capture condition indexing can be applied on a broad scale and to multiple species to estimate post-release mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, these types of studies are limited to only a few shark species (Musyl et al, 2011;Dapp et al, 2015). In the absence of traditional post-release mortality estimation techniques, the externally visible condition (sometimes termed "vitality") of the animal when removed from fishing gear (e.g., "healthy, " "sluggish, " and "moribund") has been used as a proxy for post-release mortality (Hueter et al, 2006;Benoît et al, 2012;Braccini et al, 2012). The identification of variables that contribute to poor capture condition will allow researchers to better understand causes of post-release mortality during capture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to a relatively high discard survival of invertebrates in beam-trawl fisheries, the survival rates of discarded undersized fish of commercial species are generally low: 0-50% for Pleuronectiformes, over 70% for Rajiformes and 0% for whiting and pouting (Van Beek et al, 1990;Benoit et al, 2012;Depestele et al, 2014), stressing the importance of minimizing the bycatch of undersized fish. The numbers given in Table 5 are therefore promising, and probably an underestimate because the in-liners used in the present study hamper the escape of undersized fish.…”
Section: Reduced Environmental Impactmentioning
confidence: 95%