2012
DOI: 10.1504/ijebr.2012.047420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating efficiency and productivity change in European retail sector (1998–2006)

Abstract: In this paper, we use recent robust non-parametric techniques in the European retail sector. By means of a database of firms in the European retail sector (four-digit NACE 5211) in five European countries over the period 1998-2006, we apply data envelopment analysis and compare the analysis with robust measures of efficiency (order-m estimation). Our findings reveal important differences in the results achieved by both methodologies for average mean efficiency. In addition, we analyse productivity growth using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baroos and Alves (2004) used the DEA method to estimate the total productivity change of a Portuguese retail chain, and decomposed it into technical efficiency change and technical change to obtain the productivity of different stores along the chain [23]. Moreno and Jorge (2012) used DEA to analyze the data of retail companies in five European countries from 1998 to 2006, used the Malmquist Index to analyze their productivity growth, and found the difference between the results of different measurement methods [24]. Shin and Eksioglu (2015) used the regression analysis of the Cobb-Douglas production function to confirm that RFID retailers have higher labor/revenue elasticity than non-RFID retailers, indicating that RFID retailers have higher labor productivity [25].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baroos and Alves (2004) used the DEA method to estimate the total productivity change of a Portuguese retail chain, and decomposed it into technical efficiency change and technical change to obtain the productivity of different stores along the chain [23]. Moreno and Jorge (2012) used DEA to analyze the data of retail companies in five European countries from 1998 to 2006, used the Malmquist Index to analyze their productivity growth, and found the difference between the results of different measurement methods [24]. Shin and Eksioglu (2015) used the regression analysis of the Cobb-Douglas production function to confirm that RFID retailers have higher labor/revenue elasticity than non-RFID retailers, indicating that RFID retailers have higher labor productivity [25].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%