2020
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2019.2929959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Dynamic Functional Brain Connectivity With a Sparse Hidden Markov Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HMM can be viewed as a probabilistic description of the data in which the hidden information (i.e., brain state) is captured from observable measures (i.e., fMRI time courses). An increasing number of studies have applied HMM to neuroimaging data, demonstrating it as a promising approach for understanding the temporal dynamics of brain functions [52][53][54][55] .…”
Section: Dynamic Brain Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HMM can be viewed as a probabilistic description of the data in which the hidden information (i.e., brain state) is captured from observable measures (i.e., fMRI time courses). An increasing number of studies have applied HMM to neuroimaging data, demonstrating it as a promising approach for understanding the temporal dynamics of brain functions [52][53][54][55] .…”
Section: Dynamic Brain Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Amico et al showed that the individual fingerprint of a human functional connectome could be improved from a reconstruction procedure based on a group‐wise decomposition (Amico & Goñi, 2018). Recently, the limitation of static connectivity has been widely realized, and the concept of dynamic connectivity has emerged to emphasize the time‐varying characteristics of the FC (Allen et al, 2014; Cai et al, 2017, 2018; Calhoun & Adali, 2016; Calhoun, Miller, Pearlson, & Adalı, 2014; Hutchison et al, 2013; Hutchison, Womelsdorf, Gati, Everling, & Menon, 2013; Zhang et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2019; Zhang, Fang, Liang, Calhoun, & Wang, 2018). Incorporating the information from the time‐varying FC, Liu et al studied whether and how the dynamic properties of the chronnectome acted as a fingerprint of the brain to identify individuals (Liu, Liao, Xia, & He, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To measure time-varying fMRI FC, we used a state-based model where each state is associated with a specific pattern of FC (Vidaurre et al, 2017), such that instantaneous changes in FC manifest as a change of state. This approach is based on a version of the hidden Markov model (HMM) that, in comparison to previous versions of the HMM used on fMRI (Vidaurre et al, 2017; Stevner et al, 2019; Baldassano et al, 2017; Shappell et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2019), emphasises changes in FC over changes in amplitude. To model each subject, the HMM uses a temporally-organised mixture of (quasi-) stable FC patterns in the form of region-by-region covariance matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%