2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00243-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating down deadwood from FIA forest inventory variables in Maine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pool of CWD in our analysis varied significantly from year to year depending on the level of disturbance. USDA Forest Service inventory surveys are beginning to measure CWD mass (Chojnacky and Heath, 2002) but there is not as yet enough data to indicate trends.…”
Section: Uncertainty Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pool of CWD in our analysis varied significantly from year to year depending on the level of disturbance. USDA Forest Service inventory surveys are beginning to measure CWD mass (Chojnacky and Heath, 2002) but there is not as yet enough data to indicate trends.…”
Section: Uncertainty Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ranius et al (2004) and Ranius and Kindvall (2004) estimated the amount of dead wood from the growth of living trees, tree mortality rate and CWD decomposition rate, while Chojnacky et al (2004) also used climatic variables. Chojnacky and Heath (2002) observed that the basal area of standing dead trees was a good predictor of the downed dead wood volume. Nevertheless, the accuracy of the models for predicting CWD volume has been rather poor (see Chojnacky andHeath 2002, Chojnacky et al 2004).…”
Section: Cwd Inventoriesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Chojnacky and Heath (2002) observed that the basal area of standing dead trees was a good predictor of the downed dead wood volume. Nevertheless, the accuracy of the models for predicting CWD volume has been rather poor (see Chojnacky andHeath 2002, Chojnacky et al 2004). National dead wood carbon stocks in the USA were previously estimated on the basis of living tree characteristics calibrated by reference to preliminary field estimates, but nowadays field inventory-based estimates are used (Woodall et al 2008).…”
Section: Cwd Inventoriesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Two general approaches have been used for modelling deadwood: an inventory-based, statistical approach that estimates deadwood conditions based upon predictor variables/conditions (e.g., Chojnacky and Heath 2002, Bater et al 2009, Radtke et al 2009, Woodall and Westfall 2009, Eskelson et al 2012, and a simulation modelling approach that estimates deadwood conditions for decades or centuries into the future, based on estimating parameters of deadwood decay processes and deadwood inputs into the system (e.g., Kennedy et al 2010). Both approaches have their merits and are not necessarily mutually exclusive: for example, in a simulation modelling study, a statistical approach could still be used to estimate present-day initial conditions as a validated starting point for future deadwood projections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%