2018
DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating dispersal in spatiotemporally variable environments using multievent capture–recapture modeling

Abstract: Dispersal is a key process in ecological and evolutionary dynamics. Spatiotemporal variation in habitat availability and characteristics has been suggested to be one of the main cause involved in dispersal evolution and has a strong influence on metapopulation dynamics. In recent decades, the study of dispersal has led to the development of capture-recapture (CR) models that allow movement between sites to be quantified, while handling imperfect detection. For studies involving numerous recapture sites, Lagran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the demographic methods considered in this study will therefore be more appropriate for examining dispersal in actively dispersing animals than in passive dispersers. During the last four decades, a broad range of CR models have been developed to quantify dispersal rates (Arnason, ; Lebreton et al., ; Schwarz, Schweigert, & Arnason, ) and distances (Ergon & Gardner, ; Fujiwara, Anderson, Neubert, & Caswell, ) and to test hypotheses about the effects of individual and environmental factors on each step of the dispersal process (i.e., emigration, transience and immigration; Grosbois & Tavecchia, ; Ovaskainen, ; Cayuela, Pradel, Joly, & Besnard, ; Cayuela, Pradel, Joly, Bonnaire, & Besnard, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the demographic methods considered in this study will therefore be more appropriate for examining dispersal in actively dispersing animals than in passive dispersers. During the last four decades, a broad range of CR models have been developed to quantify dispersal rates (Arnason, ; Lebreton et al., ; Schwarz, Schweigert, & Arnason, ) and distances (Ergon & Gardner, ; Fujiwara, Anderson, Neubert, & Caswell, ) and to test hypotheses about the effects of individual and environmental factors on each step of the dispersal process (i.e., emigration, transience and immigration; Grosbois & Tavecchia, ; Ovaskainen, ; Cayuela, Pradel, Joly, & Besnard, ; Cayuela, Pradel, Joly, Bonnaire, & Besnard, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When captured for the first time, a disperser could be in state oS + or oM + . Yet as these two states cannot be distinguished in Lagrange's model or its extensions (Lagrange et al 2014;Cayuela et al 2017Cayuela et al , 2018a, we arbitrarily kept the state oM + (Fig. 2).…”
Section: Quantifying the Non-effective Dispersal Rate Per Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, we analyzed how patch size and 131 disturbance influence breeding dispersal between patches. We took advantage of recent developments 132 in multievent capture-recapture models (Cayuela et al 2017a, Cayuela et al 2018 to examine this issue. 133…”
Section: Between Costs and Benefits Which Is Influenced By Inter-indmentioning
confidence: 99%