2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-3861(00)00765-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating diffusion coefficients for small molecules in polymers and polymer solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
61
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The composition at which the system turns into a glass according to this interpretation differs from the composition where the water diffusivity shows a rapid change. This behavior, also observed in non-aqueous polymer systems, can be explained in terms of the different properties being investigated (Faldi et al, 1994;Tonge and Gilbert, 2001;Karlsson et al, 2001). D w (T , a w ) represents a property that describes a rate of transport and ultimately ln [D w The molar mass of SOM is assumed to be 150 g for this parameterization.…”
Section: A2 Parameterization Of D W (T a W )mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The composition at which the system turns into a glass according to this interpretation differs from the composition where the water diffusivity shows a rapid change. This behavior, also observed in non-aqueous polymer systems, can be explained in terms of the different properties being investigated (Faldi et al, 1994;Tonge and Gilbert, 2001;Karlsson et al, 2001). D w (T , a w ) represents a property that describes a rate of transport and ultimately ln [D w The molar mass of SOM is assumed to be 150 g for this parameterization.…”
Section: A2 Parameterization Of D W (T a W )mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Clearly, the present model performs much better for MMA systems than for styrene. Our analysis suggests that this may be due to some inaccuracies in the method used to estimate diffusion coefficients, [56] which is based on a semi-empirical method developed using PMMA as a model system to estimate monomer diffusion coefficients and poly(butyl methacrylate) (PBMA) as a model for the chain length dependence [57,58] for radical diffusion coefficients. It is known that the entanglement length for polystyrene is significantly longer than for PMMA and other methacrylates [59] and this delays the onset and magnitude of the gel effect.…”
Section: Kinetic Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffusion coefficient of radical chain i is dependent on the number of monomer repeat units in the chain and the conditions (temperature, T g , monomer concentration) prevalent during the polymerization, as described in detail previously. [15,56] The location of radical i is updated and then the reaction event occurs. Any new species that are created (for example through chain transfer) are placed at new location of radical i.…”
Section: Note Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No experimental attempts have been made to measure the AF diffusion coefficient either in the core or in the shell of the coating but it is well known that diffusion coefficients of small molecules in polymeric matrixes change by several orders of magnitudes with the T g of the polymer. 26 Our initial goal was to change independently the T g of the core and of the shell; however, latexes with high shell T g (such as 1 in Table IV) do not form continuous films upon application at room temperature. All the other latexes have shell T g slightly below room temperature, to allow for the formation of a continuous film at room temperature (MFFT around 208C).…”
Section: Release Of Seanine 211 From the Coatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the empirical relationships derived by Sundberg et al in Ref. 26, one can calculate the diffusion coefficient at 258C of SeaNine 211 in a polymer (Wt AF 5 10%). If the T g of the core polymer is 1258C, then the calculated diffusion coefficient of AF in the core is found to be around 1.2 3 10 215 cm 2 /s.…”
Section: Release Of Seanine 211 From the Coatingmentioning
confidence: 99%