2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2013.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating deforestation in tropical humid and dry forests in Madagascar from 2000 to 2010 using multi-date Landsat satellite images and the random forests classifier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
90
0
7

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
90
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Multi-temporal satellite images are effective for reducing the uncertainty associated with land cover change [63]. The traditional classification algorithms (such as maximum likelihood) may not be appropriate for the classification of combined multi-date images because of the heterogeneous spectral signature of land-cover categories over large areas.…”
Section: Classification Algorithm Using Rf and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multi-temporal satellite images are effective for reducing the uncertainty associated with land cover change [63]. The traditional classification algorithms (such as maximum likelihood) may not be appropriate for the classification of combined multi-date images because of the heterogeneous spectral signature of land-cover categories over large areas.…”
Section: Classification Algorithm Using Rf and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data time series are necessary to detect deforestation. Landsat data have been primarily used in monitoring forest disturbance (Griffiths et al 2012;Schroeder et al 2011;Zhu et al 2012;Grinand et al 2013;Huang et al 2010;Gorsevski et al 2012;Renó et al 2011;Goodwin and Collett 2014), mainly due to the long archive, spectral and spatial resolution properties, and the free availability of data. Tasseled Cap Transformation (TCT) indices from Landsat near-annual time series, evaluated under trajectory-based change detection methods, resulted in identifying forest disturbances within 22 years with overall accuracy (OA) 95.72% (Griffiths et al 2012).…”
Section: Degradation / Deforestationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Random forest (RF; Breiman 2001) is increasingly used in a range of applications including digital soil mapping (Grimm et al 2008), forest biomass mapping (Baccini et al 2012), species distribution modeling (Evans and Cushman 2009) and others given its often superior performance compared to other methods (Evans et al 2011). RF is also gaining prominence in land-use classification (e.g., Aide et al 2013;Grinand et al 2013), where it outperforms classification and regression trees (CART; RodriguezGaliano et al 2012) and maximum likelihood classifiers (Schneider 2012). Nonparametric procedures like RF are particularly effective at identifying complex multivariate associations, such as those that affect patterns of forest loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonparametric procedures like RF are particularly effective at identifying complex multivariate associations, such as those that affect patterns of forest loss. Few analyses of forest loss have employed random forest (but see Aide et al 2013;Grinand et al 2013), and none to our knowledge quantitatively compare the performance of random forest to other commonly used modelling approaches, such as logistic regression, or utilize multi-scale optimization (sensu McGarigal et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%