2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00584.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating deer abundance from line transect surveys of dung: sika deer in southern Scotland

Abstract: Summary1. Accurate and precise estimates of abundance are required for the development of management regimes for deer populations. In woodland areas, indirect dung count methods, such as the clearance plot and standing crop methods, are currently the preferred procedures to estimate deer abundance. The use of line transect methodology is likely to provide a cost-effective alternative to these methods. 2. We outline a methodology based on line transect surveys of deer dung that can be used to obtain deer abunda… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
293
0
29

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(324 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(26 reference statements)
2
293
0
29
Order By: Relevance
“…Various methods exist to estimate the abundance of populations (Marques et al, 2001;Mattoni et al, 2001;Newman et al, 2003), but generally animal populations can be either surveyed visually (Brown and Boyce, 1998;Royer et al, 1998) using standardised replicated surveys (Mattoni et al, 2001), or by more intensive methods employing mark-recapture techniques (Gall, 1984;Baker, 2004;Chao and Huggins, 2005;Pollack and Alpizar-Jara, 2005). The former approach commonly employs a transect survey that records the number of individuals observed over a set distance through a habitat (Pollard, 1977;Brown and Boyce, 1998;Freilich et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods exist to estimate the abundance of populations (Marques et al, 2001;Mattoni et al, 2001;Newman et al, 2003), but generally animal populations can be either surveyed visually (Brown and Boyce, 1998;Royer et al, 1998) using standardised replicated surveys (Mattoni et al, 2001), or by more intensive methods employing mark-recapture techniques (Gall, 1984;Baker, 2004;Chao and Huggins, 2005;Pollack and Alpizar-Jara, 2005). The former approach commonly employs a transect survey that records the number of individuals observed over a set distance through a habitat (Pollard, 1977;Brown and Boyce, 1998;Freilich et al, 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies should aim to estimate the production rate, considering the one used was from the U.K., as there is no value available for the Iberian Peninsula or for other region where environmental conditions are more similar. This is particularly important since climatic conditions influence the food present in deer habitats and consequently feeding habits which has a clear role in production rate (Mitchell et al 1985;Mayle et al 1996;Marques et al 2001). In fact, we are aware of this bias, as the used value did not have a variance or standard error associated, meaning the results obtained did not took into account rate variations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient of variation (%) value was higher than the expected, but this can occur in areas where population density is not high (Smart et al 2004), such as in our study area. Several other studies regarding deer density have also recorded wide confidence intervals range, mainly where densities are smaller (Acevedo et al 2010;Marques et al 2001;Acevedo et al 2008). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…El uso de un índice de abundancia basado en conteo de grupos de excrementos a lo largo de un recorrido puede resultar muy útil, por su sencillez, fiabilidad y relación coste-esfuerzo, habiendo sido empleado en estudios de otras especies de ungulados (Acevedo et al 2008) y en estudios de dispersión y colonización de corzo (Acevedo et al 2005). Transformar abundancia de excrementos en densidad de animales, reduciendo el error de la detectabilidad de los grupos de excrementos mediante Distance Sampling, es una metodología novedosa que ha dado buenos resultados (exactos y precisos) y es rentable en términos de esfuerzo (Marques et al 2001), incluso aplicada en ambientes forestales mediterráneos (Acevedo et al 2010). Sin embargo, no está exenta de asunciones que pueden no ser acertadas.…”
Section: Discusión Aspectos Metodológicosunclassified