2017
DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating data from figures with a Web‐based program: Considerations for a systematic review

Abstract: Systematic reviewers should consider and be transparent when estimating data from figures when the information cannot be obtained from study authors and perform sensitivity analyses of pooled results to reduce bias.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
114
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 193 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
114
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature searches were performed using Web of Science (United States) and CNKI (China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, China; 2000–2017) with the search terms ‘soil water’ or ‘soil moisture’ and ‘Loess Plateau.’ To avoid publication bias, the following criteria were set to select related studies: (a) at least one of the relevant vegetation types (i.e., forest, shrubland, and grassland) and a control (farmland or grassland) representing the soil moisture conditions before the land use conversion was reported; (b) the gravimetric farmland within the 0‐ to 500‐cm layer (0–100, 100–200, 200–300, 300–400, and 400–500 cm) was measured or calculated in both the control and treatments; (c) location, temperature, and precipitation were clearly recorded; (d) studies were excluded if the experiments were conducted in the laboratory. Data presented in graphical forms were extracted using WebPlotDigitizer (Burda, O'Connor, Webber, Redmond, & Perdue, ). In general, all available data from the publications were extracted, including sites, latitude (N), longitude (E), mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP), ecological zones (EZ), slope, restoration type, land use type, species, restoration age, replications, initial soil moisture, and soil moisture after the vegetation restoration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature searches were performed using Web of Science (United States) and CNKI (China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database, China; 2000–2017) with the search terms ‘soil water’ or ‘soil moisture’ and ‘Loess Plateau.’ To avoid publication bias, the following criteria were set to select related studies: (a) at least one of the relevant vegetation types (i.e., forest, shrubland, and grassland) and a control (farmland or grassland) representing the soil moisture conditions before the land use conversion was reported; (b) the gravimetric farmland within the 0‐ to 500‐cm layer (0–100, 100–200, 200–300, 300–400, and 400–500 cm) was measured or calculated in both the control and treatments; (c) location, temperature, and precipitation were clearly recorded; (d) studies were excluded if the experiments were conducted in the laboratory. Data presented in graphical forms were extracted using WebPlotDigitizer (Burda, O'Connor, Webber, Redmond, & Perdue, ). In general, all available data from the publications were extracted, including sites, latitude (N), longitude (E), mean annual temperature (MAT), mean annual precipitation (MAP), ecological zones (EZ), slope, restoration type, land use type, species, restoration age, replications, initial soil moisture, and soil moisture after the vegetation restoration.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Usual BP values for non-BPLTTC trials were extracted by two additional researchers (A.S. and E.A.). If not reported directly, this was estimated from published graphics of BP levels over time using the webplot digitizer application [13] (http://arohatgi.info/WebPlotDigitizer/). Finally, if not available from these sources, it was taken as the BP level at end of follow-up.…”
Section: Data Extraction and Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…means, standard deviations [SD], and sample sizes) of parasitoid for both ‘control” and ‘treatment’. Fundamental statistical values were extracted from studies in which the data were presented solely graphical using Web Plot Digitizer software …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental statistical values were extracted from studies in which the data were presented solely graphical using Web Plot Digitizer software. 35…”
Section: Literature Search and Compilation Of Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%