2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating cumulative live-birth rates after IVF treatment with Kaplan–Meier and competing risk methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with previous publications demonstrating the negative effect of maternal age on LBRs in ART. 7 Age is the single most important factor in determining success rates after IVF, 8 with success rates diminishing greatly after the age of 40. 9 In our study, there was a significant decrease in CPR with age.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with previous publications demonstrating the negative effect of maternal age on LBRs in ART. 7 Age is the single most important factor in determining success rates after IVF, 8 with success rates diminishing greatly after the age of 40. 9 In our study, there was a significant decrease in CPR with age.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we used the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to estimate the crude PR, which might overestimate the cumulative PR. [ 26 ] The number of patients was limited; therefore, our study could only evaluate the optimal time to propose IVF treatment after surgery in patients with EFI scores ≥5. The purpose of the EFI classification is to provide valid clinical information on the PR over time after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use a fixed dropout rate of 50%. In Germany, dropout rates between 40% and 50% are reported . For sensitivity analysis, we range the dropout rate between 30% and 70%.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Germany, dropout rates between 40% and 50% are reported. 17,18 For sensitivity analysis, we range the dropout rate between 30% and 70%. To disregard general trends in the number of patients, we calculate market shares m:…”
Section: Stadhouders Et Al E1313mentioning
confidence: 99%