2014
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2014.76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating coverage in metagenomic data sets and why it matters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
112
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
112
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S1 shows our complete bioinformatics pipeline for all analyses performed). We used estimates of shotgun sequencing coverage to evaluate our metagenomic data sets for potential pathogen recovery using Nonpareil, an assembly-and reference-independent measure of overlap among sequencing reads (11). Although the total microbial sequencing recovery varied between samples, Ͼ95% of the microbial population was covered in 7 (63%) of the metagenomes, according to our estimates (Fig.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S1 shows our complete bioinformatics pipeline for all analyses performed). We used estimates of shotgun sequencing coverage to evaluate our metagenomic data sets for potential pathogen recovery using Nonpareil, an assembly-and reference-independent measure of overlap among sequencing reads (11). Although the total microbial sequencing recovery varied between samples, Ͼ95% of the microbial population was covered in 7 (63%) of the metagenomes, according to our estimates (Fig.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rodriguez-R and Konstantinidis, 2014a). The July and October 2010 samples (oiled and weathered oil) were assembled into B56 000 contigs per sample with N50 of B1400 bp; while those from recovered samples resulted in B12 000 contigs per sample with N50 of B745 bp (Supplementary File S1).…”
Section: Description Of Samples and Their Metagenomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S5), meaning that at least 55% (for 2,4-D mesocosms, coverage was Ͼ73%) of the total extracted unique (nonredundant) DNA was sequenced. This level represents an appropriate coverage for statistically robust comparisons of gene and species relative abundance between metagenomic data sets (35). Based on both MyTaxa taxonomic assignments of metagenomic contigs and QIIME analysis of 16S rRNA gene fragments contained in the metagenomic reads, the community diversity of the 2,4-D mesocosms was much higher at the beginning than at later time points, presumably due to the strong selection pressure of the substrate and death due to restricted growth conditions (e.g., lack of primary production, 2,4-D toxicity to some community members).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%