2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.120.170501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Coherence Measures from Limited Experimental Data Available

Abstract: Quantifying coherence has received increasing attention, and considerable work has been directed towards finding coherence measures. While various coherence measures have been proposed in theory, an important issue following is how to estimate these coherence measures in experiments. This is a challenging task, since the state of a system is often unknown in practical applications and the accessible measurements in a real experiment are typically limited. In this Letter, we put forward an approach to estimate … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that while the interference visibility V has traditionally been considered as a signature of coherence, there have been cases whereunder certain conditionsan enhancement of V was observed with increasing decoherence 33,34 , thus creating doubt on its efficacy as a true signature. Furthermore, newer measures of coherence, for example, based on the l 1 -norm of the offdiagonal elements of the density matrix of the quanton, has been developed [35][36][37] which replaced V in the generalized duality relations to capture the correct variation of coherence with decoherence 38 . However, scattering from a 'smooth' regular surface ensures that the number of possible interference paths is restricted to two for which the l 1 -norm based coherence is identical to the interference visibility V 38,39 .…”
Section: Results Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that while the interference visibility V has traditionally been considered as a signature of coherence, there have been cases whereunder certain conditionsan enhancement of V was observed with increasing decoherence 33,34 , thus creating doubt on its efficacy as a true signature. Furthermore, newer measures of coherence, for example, based on the l 1 -norm of the offdiagonal elements of the density matrix of the quanton, has been developed [35][36][37] which replaced V in the generalized duality relations to capture the correct variation of coherence with decoherence 38 . However, scattering from a 'smooth' regular surface ensures that the number of possible interference paths is restricted to two for which the l 1 -norm based coherence is identical to the interference visibility V 38,39 .…”
Section: Results Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, quantum coherence is a resurgent concept in the quantum theory and acts as a manifestation of the quantum superposition principle. We also recall the l 1 norm of coherence [58], which can almost be estimated in experiments [59,60]. For a density matrix ρ in the reference basis {|i }, l 1 norm of coherence is given by…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where c † µ,k is the fermionic creation operator at quasimomentum k for the sublattice site indexed by µ in each unit cell. It is worth noting that the l 1 norm of coherence can be estimated in experiments by other means 47 . Here, we shall connect this coherence measure with charge pumping which is also experimentally accessible in a rather direct way.…”
Section: Entanglement Entropy and Coherence Measurementioning
confidence: 99%