1983
DOI: 10.1016/0306-4565(83)90003-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating clear-day solar radiation: An evaluation of three models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although models exist to obtain an estimate of direct radiation on a clear day based on temporal variables and spatial coordinates [39], these models cannot predict the diffuse radiation, due to its dependency on, and the uncertainty of, local weather conditions. Instead, one can use typical meteorological year (TMY) data collected by the National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) for locations throughout the United States [40].…”
Section: Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although models exist to obtain an estimate of direct radiation on a clear day based on temporal variables and spatial coordinates [39], these models cannot predict the diffuse radiation, due to its dependency on, and the uncertainty of, local weather conditions. Instead, one can use typical meteorological year (TMY) data collected by the National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL) for locations throughout the United States [40].…”
Section: Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, for heading ψ and pitch angle θ p , where ψ = 0 indicates north and θ p = 0 indicates a horizontal surface, I G is rotated as shown in Figure 9a,b. These rotations are carried out using the two rotation matrices R ψ and R θ , given in Equations (39) and (40), to obtain the direct radiation vector in the vehicle coordinate system, I V . I I denotes the direct radiation vector in the intermediate coordinate system between the global and vehicle coordinate systems: The unit normal vectors for the PV module surfaces are then defined for each surface of the bus.…”
Section: Module Sizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, for spectral models, geograph ically representative data are not readily available. Conceptually, as a more practical alternative, clear sky adaptations of single-atmosphericlayer broadband radiative transfer routines (generally, .3 -3.0 similar to those of Atwater and Ball (1976) or should do but their use has also been limited because they require input data that have been scarce or unavailable and had to be estimated in various, often indirect, ways (e.g., see Suckling aind Hay, 1976;Meyers and Dale, 1983;or Tracy et al, 1983). all on an hourly basis, for 56 primary sites and 183 secondary sites (NREL, 1992; .…”
Section: Introductioamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their scaling of the maximiim amplitude was arbitrary and the daily global solar radiation data selected did not come from the maximum daily value over a 30 year span. The WHO (1967) recommends a 30 year record for 13 determining normals euid variation Tracy et al (1983). compared three, not completely physically comprehensive, broadband-radiative-transfer models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%