Estimating city-level travel patterns using street imagery: A case study of using Google Street View in Britain

Abstract

BackgroundStreet imagery is a promising and growing big data source providing current and historical images in more than 100 countries. Studies have reported using this data to audit road infrastructure and other built environment features. Here we explore a novel application, using Google Street View (GSV) to predict travel patterns at the city level.MethodsWe sampled 34 cities in Great Britain. In each city, we accessed 2000 GSV images from 1000 random locations. We selected archived images from time periods overlapping with the 2011 Census and the 2011–2013 Active People Survey (APS). We manually annotated the images into seven categories of road users. We developed regression models with the counts of images of road users as predictors. The outcomes included Census-reported commute shares of four modes (combined walking plus public transport, cycling, motorcycle, and car), as well as APS-reported past-month participation in walking and cycling.ResultsWe found high correlations between GSV counts of cyclists (‘GSV-cyclists’) and cycle commute mode share (r = 0.92)/past-month cycling (r = 0.90). Likewise, GSV-pedestrians was moderately correlated with past-month walking for transport (r = 0.46), GSV-motorcycles was moderately correlated with commute share of motorcycles (r = 0.44), and GSV-buses was highly correlated with commute share of walking plus public transport (r = 0.81). GSV-car was not correlated with car commute mode share (r = –0.12). However, in multivariable regression models, all outcomes were predicted well, except past-month walking. The prediction performance was measured using cross-validation analyses. GSV-buses and GSV-cyclists are the strongest predictors for most outcomes.ConclusionsGSV images are a promising new big data source to predict urban mobility patterns. Predictive power was the greatest for those modes that varied the most (cycle and bus). With its ability to identify mode of travel and capture street activity often excluded in routinely carried out surveys, GSV has the potential to be complementary to new and traditional data. With half the world’s population covered by street imagery, and with up to 10 years historical data available in GSV, further testing across multiple settings is warranted both for cross-sectional and longitudinal assessments.

Examining the Relationship between Urban Design Qualities and Walking Behavior: Empirical Evidence from Dallas, TX

“…Existing studies that focus on measuring the quality of the walking environment are largely designed based on developing audit instruments for measuring sidewalk, architectural, and landscape features associated with walkability [44][45][46][47][48][49][50], while few of them have been systematically validated against the actual walking [46]. More recently, researchers have sought to take advantage of advancement in technology and have used virtual audit tools such as Google Street View [47][48][49][50]. Both field and virtual audit instruments have been widely used by researchers and local governments and provide the most detailed information about the built environmental determinants of walking and physical activity.…”

Planificación de posicionamiento satelital multiconstelación en entornos urbanos

“…Estos objetos 3D son precisos en su mayoría [7], aunque pueden encontrarse errores en su geometría, tanto en las bases de datos públicas como privadas [8]. Una fuente pública de este tipo de información se encuentra con Google Street View, donde se puede aprovechar la información incluso histórica [9], con la cual se pueden conocer los cambios arquitecturales a través del tiempo.…”

Crowdsourced Street-Level Imagery as a Potential Source of In-Situ Data for Crop Monitoring

“…Here we specifically focus on crowdsourced geo-tagged and time-stamped street-view imagery. The enormous potential of these images is illustrated by recent applications in the domains of e.g., political preferences [14], income bracket prediction [15], crime rate prediction [16], electric network maintenance [17], transport [18], urban risk assessment [19], and urban greenery and urban trees [20][21][22]. Different platforms and business models coexist to host the growing archives of street level imagery.…”