2013
DOI: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-229
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating changes in metabolic power from EMG

Abstract: Metabolic rates can increase 21 times above resting levels during cycling with the majority attributed to muscular contractions. Metabolic estimates attained through gas exchange parameters are limited by the respiration rate and time delay with respect to these contractions. In contrast surface electromyography (EMG) contains instantaneous muscle contraction information at higher temporal resolutions. An adequate metabolic power-EMG relationship has not been established to use EMG as a metabolic estimate duri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have also built data-driven models using wearable sensors or data that could be collected with wearable sensors, with the aim of portable energy expenditure estimation. Many different sensors have been employed, including accelerometers [22][23][24], inertial measurement units, [25,26], heart rate monitors [27][28][29], immobile electromyography (EMG) systems [30][31][32], and various combinations [33][34][35]. With the exception of [36], these studies used linear regression and hand-designed features to estimate energy expenditure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have also built data-driven models using wearable sensors or data that could be collected with wearable sensors, with the aim of portable energy expenditure estimation. Many different sensors have been employed, including accelerometers [22][23][24], inertial measurement units, [25,26], heart rate monitors [27][28][29], immobile electromyography (EMG) systems [30][31][32], and various combinations [33][34][35]. With the exception of [36], these studies used linear regression and hand-designed features to estimate energy expenditure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where a parabolic relationship was evident, a best-fit 2nd-or 3rd-order polynomial was determined for the data with a linear least-squares fit (Mathematica version 10; Wolfram Research, Champaign, IL) to estimate the cadence at which minimum pedal forces occurred. The relative efficiency was estimated as the ratio of mechanical power output measured at the pedals to the sum of the total EMG intensities across all muscles, where total EMG intensity was used as a proxy for the metabolic power required for cycling (Blake and Wakeling 2013;Wakeling et al 2011). The relationships between cadence and both efficiency and total EMG intensity across all muscles were determined at each pedal cycle, and best-fit polynomials were fit to the data to estimate the cadence at which efficiency was maximized and total EMG intensity was minimized.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This partially explains evidence that efficiency is maximized at increasing cadences for increasing power outputs (Böning et al 1984;Coast and Welch 1985;Foss and Hallén 2004;Hagberg et al 1981;Seabury et al 1977). Obtaining greater efficiency by increasing cadence with workload may be the result of reduced muscle excitation since minimum muscle excitation also occurs at increasing cadences with increasing submaximal workloads (MacIntosh et al 2000), despite different muscle excitationworkload-cadence relationships seen in individual muscles (Blake and Wakeling 2013;Hug et al 2004;Lawrence and De Luca 1983;MacIntosh et al 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-driven methods used wearable sensors to explore portable energy expenditure estimation. Many different sensors were employed, such as accelerometers [19,20,21], activity monitors [22,23], heart rate monitors [24,25,26], electromyography (EMG) systems [27,28,29], and various combinations [30,31,32]. With the exception of [33], these studies used linear regression and hand-designed features to fit sensor data to estimate energy expenditure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%