2016
DOI: 10.5194/hess-20-4963-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating catchment-scale groundwater dynamics from recession analysis – enhanced constraining of hydrological models

Abstract: Abstract. In this study, we propose a new formulation of subsurface water storage dynamics for use in rainfallrunoff models. Under the assumption of a strong relationship between storage and runoff, the temporal distribution of catchment-scale storage is considered to have the same shape as the distribution of observed recessions (measured as the difference between the log of runoff values). The mean subsurface storage is estimated as the storage at steady state, where moisture input equals the mean annual run… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The distance distribution dynamics (DDD) hydrological model was developed by Skaugen and Onof (2014) and currently runs operationally with daily and 3-hourly time steps at the Norwegian flood forecasting service. The model is a semi-distributed conceptual model, and it is applicable for catchments ranging from small (e.g., 1 km 2 ) to large (e.g., 5000 km 2 ) and temporal resolutions ranging from low (e.g., daily time step) to high (e.g., hourly time step).…”
Section: General Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance distribution dynamics (DDD) hydrological model was developed by Skaugen and Onof (2014) and currently runs operationally with daily and 3-hourly time steps at the Norwegian flood forecasting service. The model is a semi-distributed conceptual model, and it is applicable for catchments ranging from small (e.g., 1 km 2 ) to large (e.g., 5000 km 2 ) and temporal resolutions ranging from low (e.g., daily time step) to high (e.g., hourly time step).…”
Section: General Description Of the Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variables are defined as follows: TG is the 24 h average between 06:00 UTC of the day, reported as time stamp, and 06:00 UTC of the previous day; RR is the accumulated precipitation over the same time interval as TG, and RR data have been corrected for the wind-induced under-catch of the gauges; TX and TN are, respectively, the maximum and minimum observed temperatures between 18:00 UTC of the day reported as time stamp and 18:00 UTC of the previous day. TG and RR share the same day definition so as to serve hydrological applications (Saloranta, 2016;Skaugen and Mengistu, 2016). As a result of choices made in the past at MET Norway, TX and TN have a different day definition than RR and TG.…”
Section: Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume of the saturated zone and the unsaturated zone are inversely related i.e. the higher the unsaturated zone volume, the lower the saturated zone Mengistu, 2016, Skaugen andOnof, 2014).…”
Section: The Subsurface 170mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hillslope and river flow dynamics of DDD is hence described by unit hydrographs (UHs) derived from distance distributions from a GIS and celerity derived from recession analysis Mengistu, 2016, Skaugen andOnof, 2014). When the distance distributions are 195 associated with flow celerity of the hillslope and rivers, we obtain the distributions of travel times which constitutes the time area concentration curve (Maidment, 1993).…”
Section: Runoff Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%