2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40258-020-00609-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Catastrophic Health Expenditures from Household Surveys: Evidence from Living Standard Measurement Surveys (LSMS)-Integrated Surveys on Agriculture (ISA) from Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract: Background Out of pocket (OOP) payments for healthcare remain a significant health financing challenge in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Understanding the drivers and impacts of this financial health burden is both an economic and a public health priority. Objective This study examines how the burden of OOP health expenditures varies with different thresholds for financial catastrophe. Methods The analysis is based on Livings Standards Measurement Surveys (LSMS)-Integrated Surveys on Agriculture (ISA) for five SSA … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other non-health expenditures (rent, utilities and education) are financed with the same household resources as healthcare, and if substantial, can reduce resources ‘available’ for health expenditure. 45 We did not collect information to assess the magnitude of non-health expenses incurred by households. But having other young children or productivity losses are circumstances that can reduce resources available to households explaining their association with reduced odds of CHE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other non-health expenditures (rent, utilities and education) are financed with the same household resources as healthcare, and if substantial, can reduce resources ‘available’ for health expenditure. 45 We did not collect information to assess the magnitude of non-health expenses incurred by households. But having other young children or productivity losses are circumstances that can reduce resources available to households explaining their association with reduced odds of CHE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several studies analysed nationally-representative surveys, their findings differ from ours because they do not address a specific illness, target chronic conditions, and may have limited applicability to our study setting due to subnational differences in healthcare seeking behaviour. [18,41,42] At CHE 10 , the cost of treatment costs had significant burden on households regardless of their income. At higher thresholds, our results are similar to others including those that used household income as a measure of available resources like we did.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other non-health expenditures (rent, utilities and education) are financed with the same household resources as health care, and if substantial, can reduce resources 'available' for health expenditure. [41] We did not collect information to assess the magnitude of non-health expenses incurred by households.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High OOP payments, low government health spending, and lack of policy clarity around purchasing of healthcare from private providers by public purchasers are among the challenges identified in the papers in this special issue. The persistently high OOP expenditures in SSA raise concerns about the prospect of achieving the goal of UHC in the region, especially given that it is primarily the poor who make these catastrophic payments [26]. It highlights the extent of financial protection across the continent and the need to do more to protect the most vulnerable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The next batch of papers (three in total) undertakes empirical analyses of specific health financing issues in SSA. Ssewanyana and Kasirye [26] estimate catastrophic health expenditures from household surveys in five countries: Ethiopia, Malawi, Nigeria, Tanzania and Uganda. They note that the burden of catastrophic health expenditures remains substantial in SSA and call for renewed attention to the expansion of public revenues to finance health expenditures.…”
Section: Content Of This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%