2005
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating cancer survival and clinical outcome based on genetic tumor progression scores

Abstract: Mtreemix, a software package for estimating tree mixture models, is freely available for non-commercial users at http://mtreemix.bioinf.mpi-sb.mpg.de. The raw cancer datasets and R code for the analysis with Cox models are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the mutagenetic tree for prostate cancer found in Rahnenführer et al (2005, Fig. 2) explains only 56% of the data at a log-likelihood of only −248.4.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For example, the mutagenetic tree for prostate cancer found in Rahnenführer et al (2005, Fig. 2) explains only 56% of the data at a log-likelihood of only −248.4.…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, 8p− refers to the loss (−) of the small arm (p) of chromosome 8. We consider 54 prostate cancer samples, each defined by the presence or absence of the nine alterations 3q+, 4q+, 6q+, 7q+, 8p−, 8q+, 10q−, 13q+, and Xq+ as defined in Rahnenführer et al (2005).…”
Section: Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These probabilities can be converted to average waiting times, by assuming Poisson processes for the occurrence of aberrations, see Rahnenfü hrer et al [25] for details. The GPS of a tumor then is defined as the average waiting time of its pattern of genetic aberrations, given the underlying tree mixture model.…”
Section: Genetic Progression Scorementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of methods for inferring temporal progression of mutations from cross-sectional data have been introduced (Desper et al, 2000(Desper et al, , 1999Beerenwinkel et al, 2005a,b;Rahnenführer et al, 2005;Tofigh et al, 2011;Hjelm et al, 2006;Gerstung et al, 2009;Beerenwinkel and Sullivant, 2009;Beerenwinkel et al, 2006Beerenwinkel et al, , 2007Gerstung et al, 2011;Sakoparnig and Beerenwinkel, 2012;Shahrabi Farahani and Lagergren, 2013) (see section 1.1). These methods consider models of increasing complexity for cancer progression: trees, mixtures of trees, and Bayesian network models with different constraints.…”
Section: Introduction Cmentioning
confidence: 99%