2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10021-020-00552-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Benthic Light Regimes Improves Predictions of Primary Production and constrains Light-Use Efficiency in Streams and Rivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 21 , 55 , 56 ]), potential light availability was the best predictor of GPP across sites in the summer/fall, regardless of their relation to a WWTP ( Fig 5 ). This relationship could further have been improved by accounting for variation in light attenuation with depth [ 19 ] as depths across sites can vary by a factor of two ( Table 2 ). Likely because of this strong spatial control on light availability, we observed that amplification effects were longitudinally limited, with rates returning to pre-WWTP levels after a few km ( Fig 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 21 , 55 , 56 ]), potential light availability was the best predictor of GPP across sites in the summer/fall, regardless of their relation to a WWTP ( Fig 5 ). This relationship could further have been improved by accounting for variation in light attenuation with depth [ 19 ] as depths across sites can vary by a factor of two ( Table 2 ). Likely because of this strong spatial control on light availability, we observed that amplification effects were longitudinally limited, with rates returning to pre-WWTP levels after a few km ( Fig 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple factors influence diel DO signals, from light to nutrient inputs, but their relative influence is poorly understood. High spatiotemporal variability in DO has been observed as a function of external drivers like light [ 19 ], frequency and timing of storms [ 20 ], and temperature [ 21 , 22 ]. In contrast, the effect of nutrient (i.e., carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P)) concentrations on DO (via changes to GPP and ER) is less clear [ 21 , 23 ] and may only be evident when light and disturbance are not limiting to GPP [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While nationally riparian attenuation only limited half of river length, this varied greatly across ecoregions and appears to covary with the percentage of forested reaches. Our model of light availability used turbidity as a measure of water clarity, but gradients of coloration also influence light availability and GPP (Kirk et al., 2020). We assumed that light was a first‐order control on GPP and sets the upper boundary of ecosystem productivity, but GPP is not solely determined by light.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, anthropogenic influences from land use (Glendell and Brazier 2014) and nutrient enrichment (Hilton et al 2006) increase particulate loads in streams and rivers. Quantification of benthic light regimes (i.e., integrating canopy and water column light attenuation) greatly improves predictions of stream primary production (Kirk et al 2020) and enables investigation of the role that changing light regimes play in modulating benthic community structure and function (Grubisic et al 2017, Bengtsson et al 2018.…”
Section: Model Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%