2008
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2794008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Asset Correlations from Stock Prices or Default Rates: Which Method is Superior?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Equity market data are relative to fundamental asset data, not sparse, easily accessible, cover a long history (especially for companies that have been around before 2008) and could be considered a proxy to the asset prices and, finally, the credit default swaps. Unfortunately, the literature suggests that market equity returns can result in misstated asset returns (see, e.g., Düllmann et al 2008;Laurent et al 2016). However, using directly observed equity prices (compared to illiquid or non-existent corporate credit default spread data) to model default correlations could allow more transparency in understanding and risk managing the magnitude of the movements between obligors.…”
Section: Correlation Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equity market data are relative to fundamental asset data, not sparse, easily accessible, cover a long history (especially for companies that have been around before 2008) and could be considered a proxy to the asset prices and, finally, the credit default swaps. Unfortunately, the literature suggests that market equity returns can result in misstated asset returns (see, e.g., Düllmann et al 2008;Laurent et al 2016). However, using directly observed equity prices (compared to illiquid or non-existent corporate credit default spread data) to model default correlations could allow more transparency in understanding and risk managing the magnitude of the movements between obligors.…”
Section: Correlation Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%