2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Arundo donax ramet recruitment using degree-day based equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Growth rate increased linearly from T b to the optimal temperature with the greatest rate at 28 8C and 0 MPa. This agrees with an upper threshold estimate of 30 8C in Spencer and Ksander (2006). The mean T b estimate from lab data of 12.7 8C was high but within the range of 8-14 8C estimated by Spencer and Ksander (2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Growth rate increased linearly from T b to the optimal temperature with the greatest rate at 28 8C and 0 MPa. This agrees with an upper threshold estimate of 30 8C in Spencer and Ksander (2006). The mean T b estimate from lab data of 12.7 8C was high but within the range of 8-14 8C estimated by Spencer and Ksander (2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This agrees with an upper threshold estimate of 30 8C in Spencer and Ksander (2006). The mean T b estimate from lab data of 12.7 8C was high but within the range of 8-14 8C estimated by Spencer and Ksander (2006). One rhizome segment sprouted after 68 days at 10 8C.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These features make the cultivation of giant reed advantageous from both an economic and energetic point of view even in marginal areas, where competition for land surfaces between food (or feed) and energy crops is not a critical issue. However, the interest in giant reed as an energy crop has increased only recently and this is probably the reason why process-based crop models for simulating this species are still not available, although a structural model (Thornby et al, 2007) and some phenological (Spencer and Ksander, 2006;Graziani and Steinmaus, 2009) and biometric (Pompeiano et al, 2013) relationships were proposed. Some peculiar features of giant reed (e.g., the presence of a rhizome and its role in determining the rate of stalk emission) make generic crop simulators (e.g., CropSyst, WOFOST, STICS) unsuitable, and attempts to target their calibration would likely lead to poor performance or to inconsistent parameterizations, potentially undermining model robustness (Confalonieri et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Degree-days have been used in phenological analysis applied to different kind of crops, both in temperate zones (Narwal et al, 1986;Allen and O'brien, 1986;Undersander and Christiansen, 1986;Jones et al, 1991;Sharratt et al, 1989;Spencer et al, 2000;Spencer and Ksander, 2006) and in tropical zones as well (Lemos et al, 1997;McBeth et al, 2001;Bell and Wright, 1998;Jullien et al, 2008;Guan et al, 2009). Degree-days also have been used in insect phenology studies (Tokeshi, 1985;Lindblad and Sigvald, 1996;Hart et al, 1997;Broufas and Koveos, 2000;Milonas et al, 2001;Olsen, 2003;Hirata and Higashi, 2008;Kumral et al, 2008;Naves and Sousa, 2009;Nietschke et al, 2007;Elliot et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%