Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3328526.3329628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Approximate Incentive Compatibility

Abstract: In practice, most mechanisms for selling, buying, matching, voting, and so on are not incentive compatible. We present techniques for estimating how far a mechanism is from incentive compatible. Given samples from the agents' type distribution, we show how to estimate the extent to which an agent can improve his utility by misreporting his type. We do so by first measuring the maximum utility an agent can gain by misreporting his type on average over the samples, assuming his true and reported types are from a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The general theorem of Balcan et al [2019a] (mentioned in Section 2.3) can be used to recover the bounds in these papers. Furthermore, the dispersion tools derived in Section 3 have been used for providing estimators for the degree of approximate incentive compatibility of an auction, another important problem in modern auction design [Balcan et al, 2019b].…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general theorem of Balcan et al [2019a] (mentioned in Section 2.3) can be used to recover the bounds in these papers. Furthermore, the dispersion tools derived in Section 3 have been used for providing estimators for the degree of approximate incentive compatibility of an auction, another important problem in modern auction design [Balcan et al, 2019b].…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One thread of work has been learning-theoretic, determining the sample complexity for various known families of auctions to estimate properties like revenue [5,8,36] or incentive compatibility [4].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that Theorems 1 and 2 are significantly stronger versions of the theorem we presented in (Bosshard et al, 2017) producing much tighter bounds on ε. The general idea of using a finite subset of the value space to obtain a bound on the whole value space was also used more recently by Balcan et al (2019) who employ learning theory to estimate approximate incentive compatibility of non-truthful mechanisms.…”
Section: The Verification Phasementioning
confidence: 99%