1990
DOI: 10.1016/0952-8180(90)90062-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating anesthetic depth by electroencephalography during anesthetic induction and intubation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Controversy exists on the use of these measures to monitor loss and return of consciousness, depth of anaesthesia and hypnotic drug effect. Initial reports on the classical univariate EEG measures (MF and SEF 95% and RDEL-TA) concluded that these correlated well with anaesthetic adequacy (27)(28)(29). All these investigators used haemodynamic or somatic (movement) response to surgical stimulus as the clinical end-point to assess the accuracy of the different anaesthetic depth indicators (3), but this clinical end-point has proved not to be accurate for this purpose (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controversy exists on the use of these measures to monitor loss and return of consciousness, depth of anaesthesia and hypnotic drug effect. Initial reports on the classical univariate EEG measures (MF and SEF 95% and RDEL-TA) concluded that these correlated well with anaesthetic adequacy (27)(28)(29). All these investigators used haemodynamic or somatic (movement) response to surgical stimulus as the clinical end-point to assess the accuracy of the different anaesthetic depth indicators (3), but this clinical end-point has proved not to be accurate for this purpose (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, other data obtained from the PAC, such as cardiac output and mixed venous oxyhemoglobin saturation, were not analyzed because they were not recorded as continuous electronic data. Sixth, the depth of anesthesia [ 37 ] and ventilatory conditions, such as airway pressure, were not assessed. Seventh, this was a single-center analysis that included a small number of events, although the patient characteristics shown in Table 1 were comparable to those in a previous Japanese database study [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%